PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Thomas W. Johnson AU - Irfaan Dar AU - Kelly Donohue AU - Yama Y. Xu AU - Esmeralda Santiago AU - Olga Selioutski AU - Mark A. Marinescu AU - Ross K. Maddox AU - Tong Tong Wu AU - Giovanni Schifitto AU - Igor Gosev AU - Regine Choe AU - Imad Khan TI - Increased interhemispheric asymmetry of cerebral blood flow in comatose adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation AID - 10.1101/2021.10.25.21265432 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.10.25.21265432 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/26/2021.10.25.21265432.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/26/2021.10.25.21265432.full AB - Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a mechanical circulatory support method that is associated with a high burden of neurologic injury, but neurologic examination and imaging of this population presents prohibitive medical and logistical challenges. Diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) can measure relative cerebral blood flow (rBF) non-invasively at the bedside. In this study we observed interhemispheric differences in rBF in response to mean arterial pressure (MAP) changes in adult ECMO recipients. Thirteen patients were recruited (ages 21-78, 7 with cardiac arrest, 4 with acute heart failure, 2 with acute respiratory distress syndrome). They were dichotomized via Glasgow Coma Scale Motor score (GCS-M) into comatose (GCS-M ≤ 4; n=4) and non-comatose (GCS-M > 4; n=9) groups. Comatose patients had more interhemispheric rBF asymmetry (ASYMrBF) vs. non-comatose patients over a range of MAP values (29% [IQR 23-34%] vs. 11% [IQR 8-13%], p=0.009). ASYMrBF in comatose patients resolved near a MAP range of 70-80 mm Hg, while rBF remained symmetric through a wider MAP range in non-comatose patients. Associations between post-oxygenator pCO2 or pH vs. ASYMrBF individually did not meet significance, though the linear model slopes were different between comatose and non-comatose subgroups. Here we have demonstrated asymmetric cerebral autoregulation in comatose ECMO patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by a University of Rochester Research Award.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The IRB of University of Rochester gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.