PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Karan Pattni AU - Daniel Hungerford AU - Sarah Adams AU - Iain Buchan AU - Christopher P Cheyne AU - Marta García-Fiñana AU - Ian Hall AU - David M Hughes AU - Christopher Overton AU - Xingna Zhang AU - Kieran J. Sharkey TI - Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines for reducing susceptibility to infection with the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 AID - 10.1101/2021.10.12.21264840 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.10.12.21264840 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/14/2021.10.12.21264840.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/14/2021.10.12.21264840.full AB - Background From January to May 2021 the alpha variant (B.1.1.7) of SARS-CoV-2 was the most commonly detected variant in the UK, but since then the Delta variant (B.1.617.2), first detected in India, has become the predominant variant. The UK COVID-19 vaccination programme started on 8th December 2020. Most vaccine effectiveness studies to date have focused on the alpha variant. We therefore aimed to estimate the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines in preventing infection with respect to the Delta variant in a UK setting.Methods We used anonymised public health record data linked to infection data (PCR) using the Combined Intelligence for Population Health Action resource. We then constructed an SIR epidemic model to explain SARS-CoV-2 infection data across the Cheshire and Merseyside region of the UK.Results We determined that the effectiveness of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine in reducing susceptibility to infection is 39% (95% credible interval [34,43]) and 64% (95% credible interval [61,67]) for a single dose and a double dose respectively. For the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, the effectiveness is 20% (95% credible interval [10,28]) and 84% (95% credible interval [82,86]) for a single-dose and a double dose respectively.Conclusion Vaccine effectiveness for reducing susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection shows noticeable improvement after receiving two doses of either vaccine. Findings also suggest that a full course of the Pfizer-BioNTech provides the optimal protection against infection with the Delta variant. This would advocate for completing the full course programme to maximise individual protection and reduce transmission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe thank CIPHA for providing access to the data used in this study. KJS and KP acknowledge support from the EPSRC (grant EP/T031727/1). DH is funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Post-doctoral Fellowship (PDF-2018-11-ST2-006).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of The University of Liverpool waived ethical approval for this work. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesPseudonymised data are accessible via Combined Intelligence for Population Health Action (CI-PHA). Requests can be made to the Data Asset and Access Group for extracts of the larger-scale data which cannot be released openly due to information governance requirements. All R code is accessible from the corresponding author.AICAkaike Information CriterionCIConfidence intervalCIPHACombined Intelligence for Population Health ActionMCMCMarkov Chain Monte CarloNHSNational Health ServiceNIMSNational Immunisation Management SystemPCRPolymerase Chain ReactionRNARibose Nucleic AcidSARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2SIRSusceptible, Infectious or Recovered/RemovedSEIRSusceptible, Exposed, Infectious or Recovered/RemovedUKUnited Kingdom