%0 Journal Article %A Amanda J. Lea %A Charles Waigwa %A Benjamin Muhoya %A Francis Lotukoi %A Julie Peng %A Lucas P. Henry %A Varada Abhyankar %A Joseph Kamau %A Dino Martins %A Michael Gurven %A Julien F. Ayroles %T Socioeconomic status effects on health vary between rural and urban Turkana %D 2021 %R 10.1101/2021.07.23.21260771 %J medRxiv %P 2021.07.23.21260771 %X Background and objectives Understanding the social determinants of health is a major goal in evolutionary biology and human health research. Low socioeconomic status (often operationalized as absolute material wealth) is consistently associated with chronic stress, poor health, and premature death in high income countries. However, the degree to which wealth gradients in health are universal—or are instead made even steeper under contemporary, post-industrial conditions—remains poorly understood.Methodology We quantified absolute material wealth and several health outcomes among a population of traditional pastoralists, the Turkana of northwest Kenya, who are currently transitioning toward a more urban, market-integrated lifestyle. We assessed whether wealth associations with health differed in subsistence-level versus urban contexts. We also explored the causes and consequences of wealth-health associations by measuring serum cortisol, potential sociobehavioral mediators in early life and adulthood, and adult reproductive success (number of surviving offspring).Results Higher socioeconomic status and greater material wealth predicts better self-reported health and more offspring in traditional pastoralist Turkana, but worse cardiometabolic health and fewer offspring in urban Turkana. We do not find robust evidence for either direct biological mediators (i.e., cortisol) or indirect sociobehavioral mediators (e.g., adult diet or health behaviors, early life experiences) of wealth-health relationships in either context.Conclusions and implications While social gradients in health are well-established in humans and animals across a variety of socioecological contexts, we show that the relationship between wealth and health can vary within a single population. Our findings emphasize that changes in economic and societal circumstances may directly alter how, why, and under what conditions socioeconomic status predicts health.Lay summary High socioeconomic status predicts better health and more offspring in traditional Turkana pastoralists, but worse health and fewer offspring in individuals of the same group living in urban centers. Together, our work shows that under different economic and societal circumstances, wealth effects on health may manifest in very different ways.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by awards to J.F.A. through Princeton University's Dean for Research Innovations Funds as well as the Chan Zuckerburg Initiative. A.J.L. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Helen Hay Whitney Foundation. We declare no conflicts of interest.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by Princeton University's Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research (IRB# 10237), and Maseno University's Ethics Review Committee (MSU/DRPI/MUERC/00519/18). We also received county-level approval for research activities, and research permits from Kenya's National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI/P/18/46195/24671). Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants after the study goals, sampling procedures, and potential risks were discussed with community elders and explained to participants in their preferred language (by both a local official, usually the village chief, and by researchers or field assistants).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAnonymized data underlying the main results will be publicly available on Dryad following publication. %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/10/11/2021.07.23.21260771.full.pdf