PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - L. Filbrich AU - C. Verfaille AU - G. Vannuscorps AU - A. Berquin AU - O. Barbier AU - X. Libouton AU - V. Fraselle AU - D. Mouraux AU - V. Legrain TI - Atypical influence of biomechanical knowledge in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome-Towards a different perspective on body representation AID - 10.1101/2021.10.05.21264512 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.10.05.21264512 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/07/2021.10.05.21264512.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/07/2021.10.05.21264512.full AB - Part of the multifaceted pathophysiology of Complex Regional Pain syndrome (CRPS) has been ascribed to a lateralized maladaptive neuroplasticity in sensorimotor cortices, a finding that has been corroborated by behavioral studies indicating that CRPS patients indeed present difficulties in mentally representing their painful limb. Hand laterality judgment tasks (HLT) are widely used to measure such difficulties, with the laterality of hand stimuli corresponding to the affected hand judged more slowly than the one of hand stimuli corresponding to the unaffected hand. Importantly, the HLT is also regularly used in the rehabilitation of CRPS and other chronic pain disorders, with the aim to activate motor imagery and, consequently, restoring the cortical representation of the limb. The potential of these tasks to elicit motor imagery is thus critical to their use in therapy. Yet, the influence of the biomechanical constraints (BMC) on HLT reaction time, supposed to reflect the activation of motor imagery, is rarely verified. In the present study we investigated the influence of the BMC on the perception of hand postures and movements. The results of a first experiment, in which a HLT was used, showed that CRPS patients were significantly slower than controls in judging hand stimuli, whether or not the depicted hand corresponded to their affected hand, but that their performance did not differ from controls when they judged non-body stimuli. Results regarding reaction time patterns reflecting the BMC were inconclusive in CRPS and controls, questioning the validity of the task in activating motor imagery processes. In a second experiment we therefore directly investigated the influence of implicit knowledge of upper-limb BMC on perceptual judgments of hand movements with the apparent body movement perception task. Participants judge the perceived path of movement between two depicted hand positions, with only one of the two proposed paths that is biomechanically plausible. While the controls chose the biomechanically plausible path most of the time, CRPS patients did not, indicating that the perception and/or use of the BMC seems to be disturbed in CRPS. These findings show a non-lateralized body representation impairment in CRPS, which might be related to difficulties in using correct knowledge of the body’s biomechanics. Most importantly however, our results, in agreement with previous studies, indicate that it seems highly challenging to measure motor imagery and the indexes of BMC with the classical HLT task, which has important implications for the rehabilitation of chronic pain with these tasks.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementL.F., C.V. and V.L. are supported by the Fund for Scientific Research of the French-speaking Community of Belgium (F.R.S.-FNRS).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Commission d'Ethique Biomedicale Hospitalo-Facultaire de l'UCLouvain (EudraCT: B403201214265)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.