RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The consequences of a year of the COVID-19 pandemic for the mental health of young adult twins in England and Wales
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.10.07.21264655
DO 10.1101/2021.10.07.21264655
A1 Kaili Rimfeld
A1 Margherita Malanchini
A1 Ryan Arathimos
A1 Agnieszka Gidziela
A1 Oliver Pain
A1 Andrew McMillan
A1 Rachel Ogden
A1 Louise Webster
A1 Amy E. Packer
A1 Nicholas G. Shakeshaft
A1 Kerry L. Schofield
A1 Jean-Baptiste Pingault
A1 Andrea G. Allegrini
A1 Argyris Stringaris
A1 Sophie von Stumm
A1 Cathryn M. Lewis
A1 Robert Plomin
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/07/2021.10.07.21264655.abstract
AB The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted all our lives, not only through the infection itself, but also through the measures taken to control the virus’s spread (e.g., lockdown). Here we investigated how the COVID-19 pandemic and unprecedented lockdown affected the mental health of young adults in England and Wales. We compared the mental health symptoms of up to 4,000 twins in their mid-twenties in 2018 prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (T1) to those in a four-wave longitudinal data collection during the pandemic in April, July, and October 2020, and in March 2021 (T2-T5). The average changes in mental health were small-to-medium and mainly occurred from 2018 (T1) to March 2020 (T2, one month following the start of lockdown; average Cohen d=0.14). Despite the expectation of catastrophic effects on the pandemic on mental health of our young adults, we did not observe trends in worsening mental health during the pandemic (T3-T5). Young people with pre-existing mental health problems were adversely affected at the beginning of the pandemic, but their increased problems largely subsided as the pandemic persisted. Twin analyses indicated that the aetiology of individual differences did not change during the lockdown. The average heritability of mental health symptoms was 33% across 5 waves of assessment, and the average genetic correlation between T1 and T2-T5 was .95, indicating that genetic effects before the pandemic (T1) are substantially correlated with genetic effects up to a year later (T2-T5). We conclude that on average the mental health of young adults in England and Wales has been remarkably resilient to the effects of the pandemic and associated lockdown.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe gratefully acknowledge the ongoing contribution of the participants in the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) and their families. TEDS was supported by a program grant to RP from the UK Medical Research Council (MR/M021475/1 and previously G0901245), with additional support from the US National Institutes of Health (AG046938). RP is supported by a Medical Research Council Professorship award (G19/2). KR is supported by a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship. SvS is supported by a Jacobs Foundation fellowship. The authors acknowledge use of the research computing facility at Kings College London, Rosalind (https://rosalind.kcl.ac.uk), which is delivered in partnership with the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London & Maudsley and Guys & St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trusts, and part-funded by capital equipment grants from the Maudsley Charity (Grant Ref. 980) and Guys & St. Thomas Charity (TR130505). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The twins were invited by email and given a link and code to use to log on to the survey, a platform created and supported by Quodit Ltd. The survey began with an information sheet and consent mechanism. Incentives included a prize draw for iPads and shopping vouchers. Ethical approval was received from Kings College London Research Ethics Committee (Reference number PNM/09/10-104).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData for this study came from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS). Researchers can apply for access to the data: https://www.teds.ac.uk/researchers/teds-data-access-policy.