TY - JOUR T1 - Exploring the clinical consequences and genetic aetiology of adult weight trajectories JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.10.04.21264526 SP - 2021.10.04.21264526 AU - Jiayi Xu AU - Jessica S. Johnson AU - Eating Disorders Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium AU - Andreas Birgegård AU - Jennifer Jordan AU - Martin A. Kennedy AU - Mikael Landén AU - Sarah L. Maguire AU - Nicholas G Martin AU - Preben Bo Mortensen AU - Liselotte V. Petersen AU - Laura M. Thornton AU - Cynthia M. Bulik AU - Laura M. Huckins Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/07/2021.10.04.21264526.abstract N2 - Background Longitudinal weight trajectories may reflect individual health status. We examined the genetic aetiology and clinical consequences of adult weight trajectories in males and females leveraging genetic and phenotypic data in the electronic health records (EHR) of the BioMe™ Biobank.Methods We constructed four longitudinal weight trajectories using annual EHR-recorded weights (stable weight, weight gain, weight loss, or weight cycle) (n=21,487). After validating the accuracy of the trajectories (n=100), we conducted a hypothesis-free phenome-wide association study (PheWAS), including sex-stratified PheWAS, to identify diseases associated with each weight trajectory. We then performed a hypothesis-driven polygenic risk score (PRS) analysis on these weight trajectories, focusing on anorexia nervosa (AN) and depression—both commonly associated with weight changes.Findings Weight trajectory classification was highly accurate (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity > 97% for all four trajectories). Hypothesis-free PheWAS analyses identified a significant association between depression and weight cycle (OR=1.4, p≤7.7×10−16) after Bonferroni correction, but not with weight gain or loss. Compared to other weight trajectories, we also observed a significant association of osteoporosis-related phecodes with weight loss in females only (ORfemale=1.4, pfemale≤ 1.4×10−7, ORmale=0.8, pmale≥ 0.18). AN-PRS was positively associated with weight loss trajectory among individuals without eating disorder diagnoses (ORtop vs. bottom 10% PRS=1.95, p=0.00035). Consistent effect direction was observed across three ancestry groups. The AN-PRS-weight loss association was not attenuated by obesity-PRS (ORtop vs. bottom 10% PRS=1.94).Interpretation Adult weight trajectory is associated with disease both phenotypically and genetically. Our PheWAS reveals unique relationships between diseases and weight trajectory patterns, including the association of depression and weight cycle trajectory in both males and females, and osteoporosis-weight loss trajectory association in females only. In addition, our PRS analysis suggests that adults with higher AN genetic risk are more likely to have a weight loss trajectory, and this association may be independent of BMI/obesity-related genetic pathways.Funding Klarman Family Foundation, NIMH.Evidence before this study We used PubMed and medRxiv to search for phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) of BMI/weight that have been published and/or are currently in preprint. For the weight PheWAS, we used search terms: “(phewas[tiab] OR phenome wide[tiab]) AND (weight[tiab] OR BMI[tiab] OR body mass index[tiab])” on PubMed, and “phewas weight”, “phewas BMI”, “phewas body mass index”, “phenome weight”, “phenome BMI”, or “phenome body mass index” for abstract or title search on medRxiv (up to March 17, 2021). The literature search identified 45 studies in total. From title screening, 13 of the studies were further reviewed, and 5 studies were ultimately included as relevant evidence of PheWAS on weight or BMI. These five PheWAS included four studies of adult populations of European ancestry, and one study conducted in children (ALSPAC). The weight-related exposure variables used in these studies were genetic variants of the obesity-associated FTO gene, BMI-associated SNPs, BMI PRS, BMI value, and obesity status. Through using BMI/obesity-related exposures, these published PheWAS identified comorbidities associated with obesity, including type 2 diabetes, sleep apnea, hypertension, edema, liver disease, asthma, bronchitis, and earlier age of puberty in at least two of the PheWAS. The childhood PheWAS found positive associations of BMI PRS with multiple biomarkers, including leptin, C-reactive protein, IL6, triglyceride, very low-density lipoprotein, and a negative association with high density lipoprotein. One BMI PheWAS published in 2020 observed that hyperlipidemia and gastroesophageal reflux disease were only significantly associated with BMI on a phenotypic level, but not on a genetic level (e.g., BMI or obesity SNPs), likely due to the small genetic effect of single genetic variants.Regarding the impact of anorexia nervosa (AN) and depression genetic risk on weight trajectory, we searched “anorexia nervosa[title] AND (weight[title] OR BMI[title] OR body mass index[title]) AND (genetic[tiab])” or “depression[title] AND (weight[title] OR BMI[title] OR body mass index[title]) AND (genetic[tiab])” on PubMed, and “anorexia polygenic weight” or “anorexia polygenic BMI” or “anorexia polygenic body mass index” or “depression polygenic weight” or “depression BMI” or “depression body mass index” for abstract or title search on medRxiv (up to March 17, 2021). The literature search identified 36 studies in total, and 21 were further reviewed through the title screening. No studies were identified that examined the effect of depression genetic risk on BMI or weight, and only two were included as relevant evidence of AN genetic risk on BMI and weight. Of these two studies, one was cross-sectional in a small adult sample (age 18-59, n=380), and the other was longitudinal in a children/young adult population in the ALSPAC cohort (age 10-24, n=8,654). BMI PRS was found to be associated with lower BMI cross-sectionally, and with weight loss over time only in females.Added value of this study In this study, we create a novel inflection-point based method to classify longitudinal weight trajectory using weights recorded in the EHR in a hospital-based biobank (Mount Sinai BioMe™ Biobank), with an accuracy of 98% or higher through our validation study (n=100).With this validated phenotype of weight pattern over time (i.e., weight trajectory), our PheWAS analysis afforded us the opportunity to examine comorbidity across the weight spectrum and across time. We identified 143 diseases associated with weight cycle (e.g., depression, anemias, renal failure),13 diseases positively associated with weight gain trajectory (e.g., obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, edema), and 36 with weight loss (e.g., protein-calorie malnutrition, gastrointestinal complication, end stage renal disease), after Bonferroni correction, using 5% as the cutoff for clinically relevant weight change. All diseases were negatively associated with a stable weight trajectory. Furthermore, we performed, to our knowledge, the first sex-stratified PheWAS related to weight trajectory, and identified eight sex-stratified associations with weight gain (e.g., obstructive sleep apnea), eight with weight loss (e.g., osteoporosis), and ten with weight cycle (e.g., vitamin B-complex deficiencies).On a genetic level, our study fills in the gap of the impact of AN genetic risk on longitudinal weight changes in the adult population. Unlike the finding in adolescents in the ALSPAC study, which found an AN-PRS-weight loss trajectory association only in females, we found an association of higher AN genetic risk with weight loss trajectory in both men and women, with consistent effect direction observed across individuals with European, African, and Hispanic ancestry in the BioMe™ Biobank. Additionally, this association of AN genetics with weight loss was independent of the influence of obesity/BMI related genetic variants on weight.Implications of all the available evidence PheWAS is an excellent tool for exploring comorbidities associated across the weight spectrum. Our PheWAS findings identify diseases with different weight patterns (e.g., depression and weight cycle), which may reflect characteristics of these diseases, including age of onset, progression pattern, severity, and chronicity (e.g., the episodic nature of depression with the weight cycle pattern). In addition, our sex-stratified PheWAS implicates the important role of sex in weight regulation in the presence of disease. Certain sub-populations may be at greater risk of weight loss in some disease states (e.g., women with osteoporosis) and may need targeted treatment to address nutritional needs and to prevent further weight loss.Our study also suggests that people who have high AN genetic risk are at greater risk of displaying a weight loss trajectory during adulthood. However, given the limited amount of variation in the outcome of interest (e.g., weight loss) explained by the AN-PRS, the PRS may have to be jointly modeled with other risk factors to predict weight loss more accurately, or to identify subgroups at risk of weight loss. In addition, given our finding that the effect of AN genetics on weight loss was minimally affected by the obesity-related genetics, and the previously reported low genetic correlation of −0.22 between AN and obesity in the 2019 AN GWAS, this may indicate that AN- and obesity-related weight changes might have unique genetic underpinnings. Future studies that assess the pathway-specific genetic risk on weight pattern will further our understanding of the genetic architecture of longitudinal weight trajectory.Competing Interest StatementCMB has served on advisory boards for Shire/Takeda (Scientific Advisory Board member), Equip Health Inc. (clinical advisory board), and has been a consultant for Idorsia. She is also a grant recipient of Lundbeckfonden and receives royalties from Pearson (author). All authors declare no competing interests.Funding StatementJX, JJ, LMH are supported by the Klarman Family Foundation Award. LMH is supported by NIMH (R01MH118278, R01MH124839). CMB is supported by NIMH (R01MH120170; R01MH124871; R01MH119084; R01MH118278; R01 MH124871); Brain and Behavior Research Foundation Distinguished Investigator Grant; Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, award: 538-2013-8864); Lundbeck Foundation (Grant no. R276-2018-4581). In addition, this work was supported in part through the computational resources and staff expertise provided by Scientific Computing at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai under award number S10OD018522 from the Office of Research Infrastructure of the National Institutes of Health. Furthermore, this work was supported through the resources and staff expertise provided by the Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine and The BioMeTM Biobank Program at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Founded in September 2007, BioMeTM is a biobank that links genetic and electronic medical record data for over 30,000 individuals recruited primarily in ambulatory care settings in the Mount Sinai Health System in New York City. The current study was approved by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Institutional Review Board (Institutional Review Board 07-0529). All study participants provided written informed consent.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesFull PheWAS summary statistics and codes for constructing the longitudinal weight trajectories in a biobank setting are available on GitHub (https://github.com/xuj18/BioMe_weight_project). ER -