RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Infant Vaccination Does Not Predict Increased Infant Mortality Rate: Correcting Past Misinformation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.03.21263082
DO 10.1101/2021.09.03.21263082
A1 Ella Nysetvold
A1 Tess Mika
A1 Weston Elison
A1 Daniel Garrett
A1 Justin Hunt
A1 Inori Tsuchiya
A1 S William Brugger
A1 Mary F Davis
A1 Samuel H Payne
A1 Elizabeth G Bailey
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/05/2021.09.03.21263082.abstract
AB Despite extensive scientific research supporting the safety and effectiveness of approved vaccines, debates about their use continue in the public sphere. A paper prominently circulated on social media concluded that countries requiring more infant vaccinations have higher infant mortality rates (IMR), which has serious public health implications. However, inappropriate data exclusion and other statistical flaws in that paper merit a closer examination of this correlation. We re-analyzed the original data used in Miller and Goldman’s study to investigate the relationship between vaccine doses and IMR. We show that the sub-sample of 30 countries used in the original paper was not a random sample from the entire dataset, as the correlation coefficient of 0.49 reported in that study would only arise about 1 in 100,000 times from random sampling. Next, we show IMR as a function of countries’ actual vaccination rates, rather than vaccination schedule, and show a strong negative correlation between vaccination rates and IMR. Finally, we analyze United States IMR data as a function of Hepatitis B vaccination rate to show an example of increased vaccination rates corresponding with reduced infant death over time. From our analyses, it is clear that vaccination does not predict higher IMR as previously reported.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was performed in the BYU Bioinformatics Capstone course and was not supported by an external funding agency.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Brigham Young University's IRB determined that this study fit the criteria for excluded research (due to all data used coming from public datasets) and thus did not require IRB approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data and analyses are availability on GitHub at https://github.com/PayneLab/vaccine_reevaluation.