TY - JOUR T1 - Experience(s) of the medical profession: A qualitative study using narrative facilitators JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.09.30.21264334 SP - 2021.09.30.21264334 AU - Céline Bourquin AU - Sandy Orsini AU - Friedrich Stiefel Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/01/2021.09.30.21264334.abstract N2 - Physicians’ narratives are means to approach and comprehend their experiences. They reveal the practice of medicine, and inform about the physicians’ embedment in their work and the healthcare context. This study aimed to examine physicians’ experience by means of interviews based on “narrative facilitators”, which goal is to encourage storytelling and to support the narrative process. Core stories were elaborated on the key aspects that emerged from the analysis. Thirty-three physicians participated in the study. The findings showed a focus on the transformations of a profession, the need for physicians to adapt in terms of role and status, and their withstanding of conflicting projections from the public and patients. The institutional context was described as darkness in which physicians are moving. When reacting to the quotes from their peers, participants showed a variety of un-patterned stances with regard to different aspects of medicine and the medical profession. Findings also indicated that as narrators, physicians may have particular difficulties accessing their inner world. Disenchanted physicians are not beneficial, neither for the patient nor for the health care system, and their feeling of being worn out may do harm and is certainly negatively affecting themselves and their families.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF 406740-139248/2).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Human Research Ethics Committee of Vaud exempted the study from approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study will be available in Zenodo, when the article will be published ER -