TY - JOUR T1 - Gout and coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): the risk of diagnosis and death in the UK Biobank JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.09.28.21264270 SP - 2021.09.28.21264270 AU - Ruth K Topless AU - Angelo Gaffo AU - Lisa K Stamp AU - Philip C Robinson AU - Nicola Dalbeth AU - Tony R Merriman Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/01/2021.09.28.21264270.abstract N2 - Background Data on outcomes for people with gout and COVID-19 are extremely few. Our primary objective was to assess whether gout is a risk factor for diagnosis of COVID-19 and death related to COVID-19. The secondary objectives were to test for sex- and drug-specific differences in risk.Methods We used data from the UK Biobank that included 15,560 people with gout. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was employed in the following analyses using a case-control study design: Analysis A, to test for association between gout and COVID-19 diagnosis (n=459,837); Analysis B, to test for association between gout and death related to COVID-19 in a case-control cohort of people who died or survived with COVID-19 (n=16,336); Analysis C, to test for association between gout and death related to COVID-19 in the entire UK Biobank cohort (n=459,837); Analysis D, to stratify by prescription of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) and colchicine on the risk of death related to COVID-19 in a subset of the UK Biobank cohort with medication data (n=341,398).Findings Gout was associated with diagnosis of COVID-19 in analysis A (OR=1.2 [1.1 ; 1.3]) but not with risk of death in the COVID-19-diagnosed group in analysis B. In analysis C gout associated with risk of death related to COVID-19 in the unadjusted model (OR=3.9 [3.3 ; 4.7]), in Model 1 adjusted for demographic factors (OR=1.8 [1.5 ; 2.1]) and in the fully adjusted Model 2 (OR=1.3 [1.1 ; 1.6]). In Analysis C risk was higher in women than men in Model 1 adjusted for demographic factors (OR=3.5 [2.4 ; 5.0] and OR=1.5 [1.2 ; 1.8], respectively) with the difference maintained after additional adjustment for eight metabolic co-morbidities (ORMen=1.2 [0.9 ; 1.5], ORWomen=1.9 [1.3 ; 2.9]). There were no statistically significant differences in risk of death related to COVID-19 according to prescription of ULT or colchicine.Interpretation Gout is a risk factor for death related to COVID-19 using the UK Biobank cohort with an increased risk in women with gout that was also driven by risk factors outside metabolic co-morbidities of gout.Evidence before this study There are no studies investigating the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis and risk of death with COVID-19 in people with gout.Added value of this study The findings provide evidence that gout is a risk factor for diagnosis of COVID-19 and that gout is a risk factor for death with COVID-19, independent of included co-morbidities. Women with gout are at a higher risk of death with COVID-19 than men with gout.Implications of the available evidence The new evidence demonstrate that gout is a risk factor for death from COVID-19, particularly in women. This information will inform clinical decision-making in people with gout diagnosed with COVID-19. Future research should focus on replicating these findings, including a focus on understanding key factor(s) explaining the increased risk of death with COVID-19 in women with gout.Competing Interest StatementPCR reports personal fees from Abbvie, Atom Biosciences, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, UCB, Roche, Pfizer; meeting attendance support from BMS, Pfizer and UCB Pharma and grant funding from Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, all outside the submitted work. ND reports personal fees from AbbVie, Horizon, Janssen, Dyve Biosciences, Cello Health, PK Med, JW Pharmaceuticals, Selecta, Arthrosi and AstraZeneca; grants from Amgen and AstraZeneca; and non-financial support from AbbVie, all outside the submitted work. LKS reports personal fees from the New Zealand PHARMAC Therapeutic Advisory Committee.Funding StatementThe study was funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand (grant number 19/206). The funder had no role in in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UK Biobank resource was conducted under an ethical approval from the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC) of the United Kingdom. The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and informed consent was obtained from all participants.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe UK Biobank source data are publicly available. ER -