TY - JOUR T1 - Risk scores for predicting HIV incidence among the general population in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.09.28.21264246 SP - 2021.09.28.21264246 AU - Katherine M. Jia AU - Hallie Eilerts AU - Olanrewaju Edun AU - Kevin Lam AU - Adam Howes AU - Matthew L. Thomas AU - Jeffrey W. Eaton Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/29/2021.09.28.21264246.abstract N2 - Introduction Several HIV ‘risk scores’ have been developed to identify individuals for prioritised HIV prevention in sub-Saharan Africa. We systematically reviewed HIV risk scores to: (i) identify factors that consistently predicted incident HIV infection, (ii) review inclusion of community-level HIV risk in predictive models, and (iii) examine predictive performance.Methods We systematically searched nine databases for studies developing and/or validating HIV risk scores among the general population in sub-Saharan Africa from database inception until February 15, 2021. Studies not prospectively observing seroconversion or recruiting only key populations were excluded. Record screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal were conducted in duplicate. We used random-effect meta-analysis to summarise hazard ratios and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).Results From 1563 initial search records, we identified 14 risk scores in 13 studies. Seven studies were among sexually active women using contraception enrolled in randomised-controlled trials, three among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), and three among cohorts enrolling both men and women. Consistently identified HIV prognostic factors among women were younger age (pooled adjusted hazard ratio: 1.62 [95% Confidence Interval: 1.17, 2.23], compared to above-25), single/not cohabiting with primary partners (2.33 [1.73, 3.13]) and having sexually transmitted infections (STIs) at baseline (HSV-2: 1.67 [1.34, 2.09]; curable STIs: 1.45 [1.17; 1.79]). Among AGYW only STIs were consistently associated with higher incidence, but studies were limited (n=3). Community-level HIV prevalence or unsuppressed viral load strongly predicted incidence but were only considered in three of 11 multi-site studies. The AUC-ROC ranged from 0.56 to 0.79 on the model development sets. Only the VOICE score was externally validated by multiple studies, with pooled AUC-ROC 0.626 [0.588, 0.663] (I2: 64.02%).Conclusions Younger age, non-cohabiting, and recent STIs were consistently identified as predicting future HIV infection. Both community HIV burden and individual factors should be considered to quantify HIV risk. However, HIV risk scores had only low-to-moderate discriminatory ability and uncertain generalizability outside of the study populations. Further evidence on the relative value of specific factors and data outside high-risk populations will help inform optimal implementation of risk scoring algorithms in HIV programmes.PROSPERO Number CRD42021236367Competing Interest StatementJWE reports grants from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and UNAIDS during the conduct of the study; grants from NIH, UNAIDS, and WHO and personal fees from WHO outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=236367 Funding StatementThis research was supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant numbers: OPP1190661, INV-002606, OPP1164897), UNAIDS, and the MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis (reference MR/R015600/1), jointly funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), under the MRC/FCDO Concordat agreement and is also part of the EDCTP2 programme supported by the European Union.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The manuscript is a systematic review and therefore did not require IRB review.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe manuscript is a systematic review. All extracted data are reported in the supplementary material.AGYWadolescent girls and young women(a)HR(adjusted) hazard-ratioAUC-ROCarea under the receiver operating characteristic curveCHARMSCritical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies ChecklistHSV-2Human Simplex Virus – 2MMCmale medical circumcisionPrEPpre-exposure prophylaxisPROBASTPrediction Model Risk of Bias assessment tool checklistPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesRCTrandomised controlled trialSTIsexually transmitted infection ER -