PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Davies, Margaret R. AU - Hua, Xinyi AU - Jacobs, Terrence D. AU - Wiggill, Gabi I. AU - Lai, Po-Ying AU - Du, Zhanwei AU - DebRoy, Swati AU - Robb, Sara Wagner AU - Chowell, Gerardo AU - Fung, Isaac Chun Hai TI - SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Potential and Policy Changes in South Carolina, February 2020 – January 2021 AID - 10.1101/2021.09.25.21263798 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.09.25.21263798 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/28/2021.09.25.21263798.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/28/2021.09.25.21263798.full AB - Introduction We aimed to examine how public health policies influenced the dynamics of COVID-19 time-varying reproductive number (Rt) in South Carolina from February 26, 2020 to January 1, 2021.Methods COVID-19 case series (March 6, 2020 - January 10, 2021) were shifted by 9 days to approximate the infection date. We analyzed the effects of state and county policies on Rt using EpiEstim. We performed linear regression to evaluate if per-capita cumulative case count varies across counties with different population size.Results Rt shifted from 2-3 in March to <1 during April and May. Rt rose over the summer and stayed between 1.4 and 0.7. The introduction of statewide mask mandates was associated with a decline in Rt (−15.3%; 95% CrI, -13.6%, -16.8%), and school re-opening, an increase by 12.3% (95% CrI, 10.1%, 14.4%). Less densely populated counties had higher attack rate (p<0.0001).Conclusion The Rt dynamics over time indicated that public health interventions substantially slowed COVID-19 transmission in South Carolina, while their relaxation may have promoted further transmission. Policies encouraging people to stay home, such as closing non-essential businesses, were associated with Rt reduction, while policies that encouraged more movement, such as re-opening schools, were associated with Rt increase.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Georgia Southern University Institutional Review Board made a non-human subject determination for this project (H20364) under the G8 exemption category according to the Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data analyzed in this manuscript are publicly available at the New York Times GitHub repository (https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data). https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data COVID-19Coronavirus disease 2019NPIsNon-Pharmaceutical InterventionsR0Basic reproduction numberRtTime-varying reproduction numberSARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2SoEState of Emergency