PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - James H. Bishop AU - Andrew Geoly AU - Naushaba Khan AU - Claudia Tischler AU - Ruben Krueger AU - Heer Amin AU - Laima Baltusis AU - Hua Wu AU - David Spiegel AU - Nolan Williams AU - Matthew D. Sacchet TI - Real-Time Semi-Automated and Automated Voxel Placement for Repeated Acquisition Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy AID - 10.1101/2021.09.23.21264046 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.09.23.21264046 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/26/2021.09.23.21264046.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/26/2021.09.23.21264046.full AB - Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is heavily dependent on the investigative team to prescribe, or demarcate, the desired tissue volume-of-interest. Manual prescription, the current standard in the field, requires expertise in neuroanatomy to ensure spatial consistency within and across subjects. Spatial precision of MRS voxel placement thus presents challenges for cross-sectional studies, and even more so for repeated-measure and multi-acquisition designs. Furthermore, voxel prescriptions based-solely on anatomical landmarks may not be ideal in regions with substantial functional and cytoarchitectural variability or to examine individualized/targeted interventions. Here we propose and validate robust and real-time methods to automate MRS voxel placement using functionally defined coordinates within the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in clinical cohorts of chronic pain and depression. We hypothesized that increased automation would produce more consistent voxel placement across repeated acquisitions particularly in reference to standard manual prescription. Data were collected and analyzed using two independent prospective transcranial magnetic stimulation studies: 1) a single-day multi-session sandwich design and 2) a longitudinal design. Participants with fibromyalgia syndrome (N=50) and major depressive disorder (N=35) underwent MRI as part of ongoing clinical studies. MEGA-PRESS and Optimized-PRESS MRS acquisitions were acquired at 3-tesla. Evaluation of the reproducibility of spatial location and tissue segmentation was assessed for: 1) manual, 2) semi-automated, and 3) automated voxel prescription approaches. Variability of grey and white matter voxel tissue composition was reduced using automated placement protocols as confirmed by common MRS software processing pipelines (Gannet; SPM-based segmentation) and via Freesurfer-based segmentation. Spatially, post-to pre-voxel center-of-gravity distance was reduced and voxel overlap increased significantly across datasets using automated compared to manual procedures. These results demonstrate the within subject reliability and reproducibility of a method for reducing variability introduced by spatial inconsistencies during MRS acquisitions. The proposed method is a meaningful advance toward improved consistency of MRS data in neuroscience and can be leveraged for multi-session and longitudinal studies that target precisely defined regions-of-interest via a coordinate-based approach.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the NIH National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health grants 5R33AT009305 03 (NW and DS), 1F32AT010420 01 (JB), The Stanford University Molecular Imaging Scholars Fellowship T32CA118681 (JB), the Center for Neurobiological Imaging Innovation Award (JB), and the Phyllis and Jerome Lyle Rappaport Foundation (MDS). Additional data were provided by the Brain Stimulation Laboratory directed by (NW) and supported by Charles R. Schwab, the Gordie Brookstone Fund, the Marshall & Dee Ann Payne Fund, the Avy L. and Robert L. Miller Foundation, a Stanford Psychiatry Chairmans Small Grant, NARSAD Young Investigator Award, and the Stanford Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences. Declarations of interest: none of the authors have any disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Stanford University Institutional Review Board (IRB)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data and code that was used to generate the findings of this study is available upon request from either James Bishop, Ph.D. (Data) and Matthew Sacchet, Ph.D. (Code).