RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Initial emergency department vital signs may predict PICU admission in pediatric patients presenting with asthma exacerbation JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.09.22.21263918 DO 10.1101/2021.09.22.21263918 A1 Michael S Freedman A1 Erick Forno YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/26/2021.09.22.21263918.abstract AB Objective Severe asthma exacerbations account for a large share of asthma morbidity, mortality, and costs. Here, we aim to identify early predictive factors for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission that could help improve outcomes.Methods We performed a retrospective observational study of 6,014 emergency department (ED) encounters at a large children’s hospital, including 95 (1.6%) resulting in PICU admission between 10/1/2015 and 8/31/2017 with ICD9/ICD10 codes for “asthma,” “bronchospasm,” or “wheezing”. Vital signs and demographic information were obtained from EHR data and analyzed for each encounter. Predictive factors were identified using adjusted regression models, and our primary outcome was PICU admission.Results Higher mean heartrates (HR) and respiratory rates (RR) and lower SpO2 within the first hour of ED presentation were independently associated with PICU admission. Odds of PICU admission increased 63% for each 10-beats/minute higher HR, 97% for each 10-breaths/minute higher RR, and 34% for each 5% lower SpO2. A binary predictive index using 1-hour vitals yielded OR 11.7 (95%CI 7.4-18.3) for PICU admission, area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.82 and overall accuracy of 81.5%. Results were essentially unchanged (AUROC 0.84) after adjusting for asthma severity and initial ED management. In combination with a secondary standardized clinical asthma distress score, positive predictive value increased by seven-fold (5.9% to 41%).Conclusions A predictive index using HR, RR and SpO2 within the first hour of ED presentation accurately predicted PICU admission in this cohort. Automated vital signs trend analysis may help identify vulnerable patients quickly upon presentation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementDr. Forno's effort is funded in part by grant HL149693 from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the UPMC Quality Improvement (QI) Review Committee (project ID #1581), and consent was waived given the retrospective nature of the EHR review.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available from authors upon request.ADSasthma distress scoreADSPIasthma distress score predictive indexAUROCarea under receiver operator characteristicEDemergency departmentEHRelectronic health recordHRheart rateLOSlength of stayNPVnegative predictive valuePICUpediatric intensive care unitPPVpositive predictive valueRRrespiratory rateSPO2oxygen saturationTSPItwo-step predictive indexVSPIvital signs predictive index