TY - JOUR T1 - The slower antibody response in myelofibrosis patients after two doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine calls for a third dose JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.09.21.21263627 SP - 2021.09.21.21263627 AU - Fabio Fiorino AU - Anna Sicuranza AU - Annalisa Ciabattini AU - Adele Santoni AU - Gabiria Pastore AU - Martina Simoncelli AU - Jacopo Polvere AU - Sara Galimberti AU - Stefano Auddino AU - Claudia Baratè AU - Francesca Montagnani AU - Vincenzo Sammartano AU - Monica Bocchia AU - Donata Medaglini Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/23/2021.09.21.21263627.abstract N2 - Immunization with mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been highly recommended and prioritized in fragile categories with higher risk of mortality after COVID-19 disease compared to healthy people, including patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Available data on the vaccine immune response developed by MF patients, and the impact of the treatment with the inhibitor of JAK-STAT signaling ruxolitimib, are still fragmented to support an informed decision for a third dose for this category of subjects. Here, we show that 76% of MF patients develop spike-specific IgG after the second vaccine dose, but the response has a slower kinetic compared to healthy subjects, suggesting a reduced capability of their immune system to promptly react to vaccination. A reduced ACE2/RBD inhibition binding activity of spike-specific antibodies was also observed, especially in ruxolitimib treated patients. Our results contribute to answer the open question on the induction of the antibody responses in MF patients following vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, showing a slow kinetic that support the need for a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research received no external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was performed in compliance with all relevant ethical regulations and the protocol was approved by local Ethical Committee for Clinical experimentation of Regione Toscana Area Vasta Sud Est (CEASVE), protocol code 19479 PATOVAC_COV v1.0, approved on 15 Mar 2021.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available upon request. ER -