RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Epidemic models characterize seizure propagation and the effects of epilepsy surgery in individualized brain networks based on MEG and invasive EEG recordings
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.20.21263459
DO 10.1101/2021.09.20.21263459
A1 Ana. P. Millán
A1 Elisabeth C.W. van Straaten
A1 Cornelis J. Stam
A1 Ida A. Nissen
A1 Sander Idema
A1 Johannes C. Baayen
A1 Piet Van Mieghem
A1 Arjan Hillebrand
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/23/2021.09.20.21263459.abstract
AB Background Epilepsy surgery is the treatment of choice for drug-resistant epilepsy patients. However, seizure-freedom is currently achieved in only 2/3 of the patients after surgery. In this study we have developed an individualized computational model based on functional brain networks to explore seizure propagation and the efficacy of different virtual resections. Eventually, the goal is to obtain individualized models to optimize resection strategy and outcome.Methods We have modelled seizure propagation as an epidemic process using the susceptible-infected (SI) model on individual functional networks derived from presurgical MEG. We included 10 patients who had received epilepsy surgery and for whom the surgery outcome at least one year after surgery was known. The model parameters were tuned in order to reproduce the patient-specific seizure propagation patterns as recorded with invasive EEG. We defined a personalized search algorithm that combined structural and dynamical information to find resections that maximally decreased seizure propagation for a given resection size. The optimal resection for each patient was defined as the smallest resection leading to at least a 90% reduction in seizure propagation.Results The individualized model reproduced the basic aspects of seizure propagation for 9 out of 10 patients when using the resection area as the origin of epidemic spreading, and for 10 out of 10 patients with an alternative definition of the seed region. We found that, for 7 patients, the optimal resection was smaller than the resection area, and for 4 patients we also found that a resection smaller than the resection area could lead to a 100% decrease in propagation. Moreover, for two cases these alternative resections included nodes outside the resection area.Conclusion Epidemic spreading models fitted with patient specific data can capture the fundamental aspects of clinically observed seizure propagation, and can be used to test virtual resections in silico. Combined with optimization algorithms, smaller or alternative resection strategies, that are individually targeted for each patient, can be determined with the ultimate goal to improve surgery outcome.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialAll patients gave written informed consent and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the VUmc Medical Ethics Committee. No reules or procedures were imposed other than routine clinical care.Funding StatementAna P. Millan and Ida A. Nissen were supported by ZonMw and the Dutch Epilepsy Foundation, project number 95105006. The funding sources had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of results, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All patients gave written informed consent and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Vrij Universiteit Medical Center Medical Ethics CommitteeAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data used for this manuscript are not publicly available because the patients did not consent for the sharing of their clinically obtained data. Requests to access to the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author. All user-developed codes are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.