@article {Jones2021.09.15.21262637, author = {J. S. Jones and the CALM Team and D. E. Astle}, title = {A Transdiagnostic Data-driven Study of Children{\textquoteright}s Behaviour and the Functional Connectome}, elocation-id = {2021.09.15.21262637}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.09.15.21262637}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Behavioural difficulties are seen as hallmarks of many neurodevelopmental conditions. Differences in functional brain organisation have been observed in these conditions, but little is known about how they are related to a child{\textquoteright}s profile of behavioural difficulties. We investigated whether behavioural difficulties are associated with how the brain is functionally organised in an intentionally heterogeneous and transdiagnostic sample of 957 children aged 5-15. We used consensus community detection to derive data-driven profiles of behavioural difficulties and constructed functional connectomes from a subset of 238 children with resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) data. We identified three distinct profiles of behaviour that were characterised by principal difficulties with hot executive function, cool executive function, and learning. Global organisation of the functional connectome did not differ between the groups, but multivariate patterns of connectivity at the level of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks (ICNs), nodes, and hubs significantly predicted group membership in held-out data. Fronto-parietal connector hubs were under-connected in all groups relative to a comparison sample, and children with hot vs cool executive function difficulties were distinguished by connectivity in ICNs associated with cognitive control, emotion processing, and social cognition. This demonstrates both general and specific neurodevelopmental risk factors in the functional connectome.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementMedical Research Council program grant MC-A0606- 5PQ41Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the Centre for Attention Learning and Memmory cohort study was granted by the National Health Service (NHS) Health Research Authority NRES Committee East of England, REC approval reference 13/EE/0157, IRAS 127675.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAccess to this dataset is currently managed by the Centre for Attention Learning and Memory (CALM) Management Committee. It is currently being prepared for external access. However, the analysis code can be found in the OSF repository. https://osf.io/cvsu2/}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/23/2021.09.15.21262637}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/23/2021.09.15.21262637.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }