PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Carissa Bonner AU - Carys Batcup AU - Julie Ayre AU - Erin Cvejic AU - Lyndal Trevena AU - Kirsten McCaffery AU - Jenny Doust TI - The impact of health literacy-sensitive design and heart age in a cardiovascular disease prevention decision aid: randomised controlled trial and end user testing AID - 10.1101/2021.09.20.21263868 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.09.20.21263868 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/22/2021.09.20.21263868.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/22/2021.09.20.21263868.full AB - Introduction Shared decision making is as an essential principle for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, where asymptomatic people are considering lifelong medication and lifestyle changes. This project aimed to develop and evaluate the first literacy-sensitive CVD prevention decision aid (DA) developed for people with low health literacy, and investigate the impact of literacy-sensitive design and heart age.Methods We developed the standard DA based on international standards. The literacy-sensitive version included simple language, supporting images, white space and a lifestyle action plan. A randomised trial included 859 people aged 45-74 using a 3 (DA: standard, literacy-sensitive, control) x 2 (heart age: heart age + percentage risk, percentage risk only) factorial design, with outcomes including prevention intentions/behaviours, gist/verbatim knowledge of risk, credibility, emotional response and decisional conflict. We iteratively improved the literacy-sensitive version based on end user testing interviews with 20 people with varying health literacy levels.Results Immediately post-intervention (n=859), there were no differences between the DA groups on any outcome. The heart age group was less likely to have a positive emotional response, perceived the message as less credible, and had higher gist/verbatim knowledge of heart age risk but not percentage risk. After 4 weeks (n=596), the DA groups had better gist knowledge of percentage risk than control. The literacy-sensitive decision aid group had higher fruit consumption, and the standard decision aid group had better verbatim knowledge of percentage risk. Verbatim knowledge was higher for heart age than percentage risk amongst those who received both.Discussion The literacy-sensitive DA resulted in increased knowledge and lifestyle change for participants with varying health literacy levels and CVD risk results. Adding heart age did not increase lifestyle change intentions or behaviour but did affect psychological outcomes, consistent with previous findings.MeSH Terms Health Literacy, Cardiovascular Diseases, Decision Making (Shared), Life Style, Decision Support TechniquesCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialACTRN12620000806965Funding StatementThis was work was conducted as a result of Dr Carissa Bonner's Vanguard Grant from the National Heart Foundation of AustraliaAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Sydney Human Research Ethics CommitteeAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesPresently the data is stored securely at the University of Sydney's server. Should you wish to ask about accessing any data, please contact Dr Carissa Bonner at carissa.bonner{at}sydney.edu.au