RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Public perception of organ donation and transplantation policies in Southern Spain
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.17.21263724
DO 10.1101/2021.09.17.21263724
A1 Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho
A1 Maite Cruz-Piqueras
A1 Janet Delgado
A1 Joaquín Hortal-Carmona
A1 M. Victoria Martínez-López
A1 Alberto Molina-Pérez
A1 Álvaro Padilla-Pozo
A1 Julia Ranchal-Romero
A1 David Rodríguez-Arias
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/21/2021.09.17.21263724.abstract
AB Background This research explores how public awareness and attitudes towards donation and transplantation policies may contribute to Spain’s success in cadaveric organ donation.Materials and Methods A representative sample of 813 people residing in Andalusia (Southern Spain) were surveyed by telephone or via Internet between October and December 2018.Results Most participants trust Spain’s donation and transplantation system (93%) and wish to donate their organs after death (76%). Among donors, a majority have expressed their consent (59%), while few non-donors have expressed their refusal (14%). Only a minority is aware of the presumed consent system in force (28%) and feel sufficiently informed regarding the requirements needed to be an organ donor (16%). Participants mainly consider that relatives should represent the deceased’s preferences and be consulted when the deceased’s wishes are unknown, as is the case in Spain.Conclusions Public trust in the transplant system may contribute to Spain’s high performance in organ donation. High levels of societal support towards organ donation and transplantation do not correspond in Spain with similar levels of public awareness of donation and transplantation policies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was carried out through Project INEDyTO [Research on the Ethics of Organ Donation and Transplantation], funded by the Spanish Government (MINECO FFI2017-88913-P) in collaboration with the Institute for Advanced Social Studies (IESA-CSIC), which sponsored the data collection and participated in the analysis and interpretation of data.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was reviewed by the Coordinating Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics of Andalusia (PEIBA 2521-N-20), which waived full review for this type of study. Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants prior to participation.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesInformation about the methodology can be access through the link below and the reference is: PACIS EP-1807 IESA-CSIC. http://www.iesa.csic.es/pacis/ DCDdonation after circulatory deathPACISCitizens’ Panel for Social Research in Andalusia