RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Local Exhaust Ventilation to Control Dental Aerosols and Droplets
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.21.21260917
DO 10.1101/2021.07.21.21260917
A1 James R Allison
A1 Christopher Dowson
A1 Kimberley Pickering
A1 Greta Červinskytė
A1 Justin Durham
A1 Nicholas S Jakubovics
A1 Richard Holliday
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/17/2021.07.21.21260917.abstract
AB Dental procedures produce aerosols which may remain suspended and travel significant distances from the source. Dental aerosols and droplets contain oral microbes and there is potential for infectious disease transmission and major disruption to dental services during infectious disease outbreaks. One method to control hazardous aerosols often used in industry is Local Exhaust Ventilation (LEV). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of LEV on aerosols and droplets produced during dental procedures. Experiments were conducted on dental mannequins in an 825.4 m3 open plan clinic, and a 49.3 m3 single surgery. 10-minute crown preparations were performed with an air-turbine handpiece in the open plan clinic, and 10-minute full mouth ultrasonic scaling in the single surgery. Fluorescein was added to instrument irrigation reservoirs as a tracer. In both settings, Optical Particle Counters (OPCs) were used to measure aerosol particles between 0.3 – 10.0 μm and liquid cyclone air samplers were used to capture aerosolised fluorescein tracer. Additionally, in the open plan setting fluorescein tracer was captured by passive settling onto filter papers in the environment. Tracer was quantified fluorometrically. An LEV device with High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filtration and a flow rate of 5,000 L/min was used. LEV reduced aerosol production from the air-turbine handpiece by 90% within 0.5 m, and this was 99% for the ultrasonic scaler. OPC particle counts were substantially reduced for both procedures, and air-turbine settled droplet detection reduced by 95% within 0.5 m. The effect of LEV was substantially greater than suction alone for the air-turbine and was similar to the effect of suction for the ultrasonic scaler. LEV reduces aerosol and droplet contamination from dental procedures by at least 90% in the breathing zone of the operator and it is therefore a valuable tool to reduce the dispersion of dental aerosols.Competing Interest StatementThis work was commissioned and funded by VODEX Ltd., Southampton, UK. The research was undertaken by independent investigators at the School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University. VODEX Ltd. did not have any input into the design or conduct of this study, or the content of the manuscript. JRA, JD, NSJ, and RH have received related grants from the British Endodontic Society and the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh which did not fund the present work. CD is funded by a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Studentship. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of VODEX Ltd., the National Health Service, NIHR or Department of Health and Social Care.Funding StatementThis work was commissioned and funded by VODEX Ltd., Southampton, UK. The research was undertaken by independent investigators at the School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University. VODEX Ltd. did not have any input into the design or conduct of this study, or the content of the manuscript. JRA, JD, NSJ, and RH have received related grants from the British Endodontic Society and the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh which did not fund the present work. CD is funded by a National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Studentship. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of VODEX Ltd., the National Health Service, NIHR or Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional ethical approval obtained.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesFull datasets are available at https://doi.org/10.25405/data.ncl.14987574 https://doi.org/10.25405/data.ncl.14987574