RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of pre and postoperative nutritional supplementation in major lung surgery
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.08.21263295
DO 10.1101/2021.09.08.21263295
A1 Amy Kerr
A1 Sebastian T. Lugg
A1 Salma Kadiri
A1 Amelia Swift
A1 Nikolaos Efstathiou
A1 Krishna Kholia
A1 Venessa Rogers
A1 Hazem Fallouh
A1 Richard Steyn
A1 Ehab Bishay
A1 Maninder Kalkat
A1 Babu Naidu
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/13/2021.09.08.21263295.abstract
AB Objectives Malnutrition and weight loss are important risk factors for complications after lung surgery. However, it is uncertain whether modifying or optimising perioperative nutritional state with oral supplements results in a reduction in malnutrition, complications, and quality of life.Design A randomised, open label, controlled feasibility study was conducted to assess the feasibility of carrying out a large multicentre randomised trial of nutritional intervention. The intervention consisted of preoperative carbohydrate-loading drinks (4x 200mls evening before surgery and 2x 200mls the morning of surgery), and early postoperative nutritional protein supplement drinks twice a day for 2 weeks following surgery compared to the control group receiving an equivalent volume of water. Qualitative interviews were conducted with participants to help determine the acceptance of the study.Setting Single adult thoracic centre in the UK.Participants All patients admitted for major lung surgery. Participants were included if were able to take nutritional drinks prior to surgery and were able to give written informed consent. Patients were excluded if they were likely unable to comply with completion of the study questionnaires, they had a body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m2, were receiving parenteral nutrition or known pregnancy.Results All patients presenting for major lung surgery were screened over a 6-month period, with 163 patients screened, 99 excluded and 64 (41%) patients randomised. Feasibility criteria were met and the study completed recruitment 5 months ahead of target. The 2 groups were well balanced, and tools used to measure outcomes were robust. 97% of patients were compliant with pre-surgery nutritional drinks and 89% of the questionnaires at 3 months were returned fully completed. The qualitative interviews demonstrated that the trial and the intervention were acceptable to patients. Patients felt the questionnaires used captured their experience of recovery from surgery well.Conclusion A large multicentre randomised controlled trial of nutritional intervention in major lung surgery is feasible. It is possible to randomise eligible patients and follow up with high fidelity. A pre-op carbohydrate-loading and post-surgery supplementation is highly acceptable to patients with good compliance to both intervention and trial measures. A large multi-centre clinical trial is required to test clinical efficacy in improving outcomes after surgery.Trial registration number ISRCTN16535341Strengths and limitation of this studyThis randomised, feasibility study had pre-planned feasibility to assess whether a larger randomised trial would be feasible.The study included a large regional thoracic surgical centre and cohort of patients undergoing major lung surgery predominantly for cancer, which would be representative of full trial national recruitment.The study was not designed and powered to be large enough to provide conclusive evidence to support the use of nutritional intervention in major lung surgery, but provided evidence that a larger, substantive randomised controlled trial is feasible.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialISRCTN16535341Funding StatementThe study was funded by Birmingham Health Partnership and Nutricia provided the funding for the nutritional intervention.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was granted from Wales REC 7 research ethical committee REC reference 16/WA/0254.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll available study data can be obtained from the corresponding author.