PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Ali Salehi
AU  - Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian
TI  - Dense Optic Nerve Head Deformation Estimated using CNN as a Structural Biomarker of Glaucoma Progression
AID  - 10.1101/2021.09.08.21263299
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.09.08.21263299
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/12/2021.09.08.21263299.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/12/2021.09.08.21263299.full
AB  - Purpose To present a new structural biomarker for detecting glaucoma progression based on structural transformation of the optic nerve head (ONH) region.Methods A dense ONH deformation was estimated using deep learning methods namely DDCNet-Multires, FlowNet2, and FlowNet-Correlation, and legacy computational methods namely the topographic change analysis (TCA) and proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) methods using longitudinal confocal scans of the ONH for each study eye. A candidate structural biomarker of glaucoma progression in a study eye was estimated as average magnitude of flow velocities within the ONH region. The biomarker was evaluated using longitudinal confocal scans of 12 laser-treated and 12 contralateral normal eyes of 12 primates from the LSU Experimental Glaucoma Study (LEGS); and 36 progressing eyes and 21 longitudinal normal eyes from the UCSD Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS). Area under the ROC curves (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the candidate biomarker.Results AUROC (95% CI) for LEGS were: 0.83 (0.79, 0.88) for DDCNet-Multires; 0.83 (0.78, 0.88) for FlowNet2; 0.83 (0.78, 0.88) for FlowNet-Correlation; 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) for POD; and 0.86 (0.82, 0.91) for TCA methods. For DIGS: 0.89 (0.80, 0.97) for DDCNet-Multires; 0.82 (0.71, 0.93) for FlowNet2; 0.93 (0.86, 0.99) for FlowNet-Correlation; 0.86 (0.76, 0.96) for POD; and 0.86 (0.77, 0.95) for TCA methods. Lower diagnostic accuracy of the learning-based methods for LEG study eyes were due to image alignment errors in confocal sequences.Conclusion Deep learning methods trained to estimate generic deformation were able to detect ONH deformation from confocal images and provided a higher diagnostic accuracy when compared to the classical optical flow and legacy biomarkers of glaucoma progression. Because it is difficult to validate the estimates of dense ONH deformation in clinical population, our validation using ONH sequences under controlled experimental conditions confirms the diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers observed in the clinical population. Performance of these deep learning methods can be further improved by fine-tuning these networks using longitudinal ONH sequences instead of training the network to be a general-purpose deformation estimator.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch supported in part by an unrestricted start-up fund and a Herff graduate fellowship, Herff College of Engineering, The University of Memphis; and a summer student fellowship from Fight for Sight.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UCSD Institutional Review Board approved the study methodologies and all methods adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines for research in human subjects and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesCode availability: The DDCNet-Multires model along with necessary instructions for running the software are available to the public in the following URL: https://www.computationalocularscience.com/software