RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.03.21263023
DO 10.1101/2021.09.03.21263023
A1 Alex Handy
A1 Amitava Banerjee
A1 Angela Wood
A1 Caroline E Dale
A1 Cathie Sudlow
A1 Christopher Tomlinson
A1 Daniel Bean
A1 Johan H Thygesen
A1 Mehrdad A Mizani
A1 Michail Katsoulis
A1 Reecha Sofat
A1 Richard Dobson
A1 Rohan Takhar
A1 Sam Hollings
A1 Spiros Denaxas
A1 Venexia Walker
A1 on behalf of the CVD-COVID-UK Consortium
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/10/2021.09.03.21263023.abstract
AB Objective Evaluate antithrombotic (AT) use in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) and high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score>=2) and investigate whether pre-existing AT use may improve COVID-19 outcomes.Methods Individuals with AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score>=2 on January 1st 2020 were identified using pseudonymised, linked electronic health records for 56 million people in England and followed-up until May 1st 2021. Factors associated with pre-existing AT use were analysed using logistic regression. Differences in COVID-19 related hospitalisation and death were analysed using logistic and Cox regression for individuals exposed to pre-existing AT use vs no AT use, anticoagulants (AC) vs antiplatelets (AP) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin.Results From 972,971 individuals with AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score>=2, 88.0% (n=856,336) had pre-existing AT use, 3.8% (n=37,418) had a COVID-19 related hospitalisation and 2.2% (n=21,116) died. Factors associated with no AT use included comorbidities that may contraindicate AT use (liver disease and history of falls) and demographics (socioeconomic status and ethnicity). Pre-existing AT use was associated with lower odds of death (OR=0.92 [0.87-0.96 at 95% CI]), but higher odds of hospitalisation OR=1.20 [1.15-1.26 at 95% CI]). The same pattern was observed for AC vs AP (death (OR=0.93 [0.87-0.98]), hospitalisation (OR=1.17 [1.11-1.24])) but not for DOACs vs warfarin (death (OR=1.00 [0.95-1.05]), hospitalisation (OR=0.86 [0.82-0.89]).Conclusions Pre-existing AT use may offer marginal protection against COVID-19 death, with AC offering more protection than AP. Although this association may not be causal, it provides further incentive to improve AT coverage for eligible individuals with AF.What is already known about this subject?Anticoagulants (AC), a sub-class of antithrombotics (AT), reduce the risk of stroke and are recommended for individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) and at high risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc score>=2, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold). However, previous evaluations suggest that up to one third of these individuals may not be taking AC. Over estimation of bleeding and fall risk in elderly patients have been identified as potential factors in this under medicating.In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, several observational studies have observed correlations between pre-existing AT use, particularly anticoagulants (AC), and lower risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalisation and death. However, these correlations are inconsistent across studies and have not compared all major sub-types of AT in one study.What does this study add?This study uses datasets covering primary care, secondary care, pharmacy dispensing, death registrations, multiple COVID-19 diagnoses routes and vaccination records for 56 million people in England and is the largest scale evaluation of AT use to date. This provides the statistical power to robustly analyse targeted sub-types of AT and control for a wide range of potential confounders. All code developed for the study is opensource and an updated nationwide evaluation can be rapidly created for future time points.In 972,971 individuals with AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score>=2, we observed 88.0% (n=856,336) with pre-existing AT use which was associated with marginal protection against COVID-19 death (OR=0.92 [0.87-0.96 at 95% CI]).How might this impact on clinical practice?These findings can help shape global AT medication policy and provide population-scale, observational analysis results alongside gold-standard randomised control trials to help assess whether a potential beneficial effect of pre-existing AT use on COVID-19 death alters risk to benefit assessments in AT prescribing decisions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. SH works as a data scientist and data curator for NHS Digital which holds and processes the data.Clinical Protocols https://github.com/BHFDSC/CCU020 Funding StatementThe British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre (grant No SP/19/3/34678, awarded to Health Data Research (HDR) UK) funded co-development (with NHS Digital) of the trusted research environment, provision of linked datasets, data access, user software licences, computational usage, and data management and wrangling support, with additional contributions from the HDR UK data and connectivity component of the UK governments' chief scientific adviser's national core studies programme to coordinate national covid-19 priority research. Consortium partner organisations funded the time of contributing data analysts, biostatisticians, epidemiologists, and clinicians. AH is supported by research funding from the HDR UK text analytics implementation project. AB is supported by research funding from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), British Medical Association, Astra-Zeneca, and UK Research and Innovation. AW is supported by the BHF-Turing Cardiovascular Data Science Award (BCDSA\100005) and by core funding from UK MRC (MR/L003120/1), BHF (RG/13/13/30194; RG/18/13/33946), and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). CT is supported by a UCL UKRI Centre for Doctoral Training in AI-enabled Healthcare studentship (EP/S021612/1), MRC Clinical Top-Up and a studentship from the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospital NHS Trust. DMB holds a UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Fellowship as part of Health Data Research UK (HDRUK) MR/S00310X/1. MAM is supported by research funding from Astra-Zeneca. MK is funded by the British Heart Foundation (grant: FS/18/5/33319). RD is supported by the following: (1) NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK; (2) Health Data Research UK, which is funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation and Wellcome Trust; (3) The BigData@Heart Consortium, funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative-2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 116074. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA; it is chaired by DE Grobbee and SD Anker, partnering with 20 academic and industry partners and ESC; (4) the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre; (5) the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London; (6) the UK Research and Innovation London Medical Imaging & Artificial Intelligence Centre for Value Based Healthcare; (7) the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. SD is supported by: (1) Health Data Research UK London, which receives its funding from HDR UK funded by the UK MRC, EPSRC, ESRC, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), BHF, and Wellcome Trust; (2) The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospital NHS Trust; (3) The Alan Turing Institute (EP/N510129/1); (4) The British Heart Foundation Accelerator Award (AA/18/6/24223); (5) The BigData@Heart Consortium, funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative-2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 116074. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme and EFPIA; it is chaired by DE Grobbee and SD Anker, partnering with 20 academic and industry partners and ESC. AB, AW, RD and SD are part of the BigData@Heart Consortium, funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative-2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 116074. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data access approval was granted to the CVD-COVID-UK consortium through the NHS Digital online Data Access Request Service (ref. DARS-NIC-381078-Y9C5K). The BHF Data Science Centre approvals and oversight board deemed that this project (proposal CCU020 Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes) fell within the scope of the consortium's ethical and regulatory approvals. Analyses were conducted by approved researcher (AH) via secure remote access to the TRE. Only summarised, aggregate results were exported, following manual review by the NHS Digital 'safe outputs' escrow service, to ensure no output placed in the public domain contains information that may be used to identify an individual. The North East-Newcastle and North Tyneside 2 research ethics committee provided ethical approval for the CVD-COVID-UK research programme (REC No 20/NE/0161).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available for bona fide researchers accessible within the NHS Digital trusted Research Environment for England. Contact bhfdsc{at}hdruk.ac.uk for information on how to join the CVD-COVID-UK consortium for access. https://alexhandy1.shinyapps.io/at-evaluation-results/ https://github.com/BHFDSC/CCU020