PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Katherine V. Williams
AU  - Bo Zhai
AU  - John F. Alcorn
AU  - Mary Patricia Nowalk
AU  - Min Z. Levine
AU  - Sara S. Kim
AU  - Brendan Flannery
AU  - Krissy Moehling Geffel
AU  - Amanda Jaber Merranko
AU  - Jennifer P. Nagg
AU  - Mark Collins
AU  - Michael Susick
AU  - Karen S. Clarke
AU  - Richard K. Zimmerman
AU  - Judith M. Martin
TI  - A randomized controlled trial of antibody response to 2019-20 cell-based inactivated and egg-based live attenuated influenza vaccines in children and young adults
AID  - 10.1101/2021.09.02.21263043
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.09.02.21263043
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/06/2021.09.02.21263043.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/06/2021.09.02.21263043.full
AB  - Background Hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers to the live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) are typically lower than its counterpart egg-based inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV). Similar comparisons have not been made between LAIV4 and the 4-strain, cell-culture inactivated influenza vaccine (ccIIV4). We compared healthy children and young adult HAI titers against the 2019-2020 LAIV4 and ccIIV4.Methods Participants aged 4-21 years were randomized 1:1 to receive ccIIV4 (n =100) or LAIV4 (n=98). Blood was drawn prevaccination and on day 28 (21-35) post vaccination. HAI assays against egg-grown A/H1N1, A/H3N2, both vaccine B strains and cell-grown A/H3N2 antigens were conducted. Outcomes were geometric mean titers (GMT) and geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) in titers.Results GMTs to A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B/Victoria increased following both ccIIV and LAIV and to B/Yamagata following ccIIV (p<0.05). The GMFR range was 2.4-3.0 times higher for ccIIV4 than for LAIV4 (p<0.001). Within vaccine types, egg-grown A/H3N2 GMTs were higher (p<0.05) than cell-grown GMTs [ccIIV4 day 28: egg=205 (95% CI: 178-237); cell=136 (95% CI:113-165); LAIV4 day 28: egg=96 (95% CI: 83-112); cell=63 (95% CI: 58-74)]. The GMFR to A/H3N2 cell-grown and egg-grown antigens were similar. Pre-vaccination titers inversely predicted GMFR.Conclusion The HAI response to ccIIV4 was greater than LAIV4 in this study of mostly older children, and day 0 HAI titers inversely predicted GMFR for both vaccines. For both vaccines, the A/H3N2 cell-grown antigen levels were lower than egg-grown, but the GMFR for cell-grown and egg-grown did not differ significantly within vaccine type.Clinical Trials No NCT03982069Competing Interest StatementConflict of Interest: RKZ has received funding by Sanofi for an unrelated study. MPN has research funding from Merck & Co., Inc. for an unrelated study. JMM has received funding from Merck, Sharp and Dohme for an unrelated study.Clinical TrialClinical Trials No.: NCT03982069Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [5U01IP001035] and by National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1TR001857], [KL2 TR001856], and/or [TL1 TR001858]. This work represents the views of the authors and not the CDC or NIH. Pennsylvania Statewide Immunization Information System (PA-SIIS) vaccine registry was used to verify vaccination status. These data were supplied in part by the Bureau of Health Statistics & Registries, Pennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Department of Health specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions. REDCap and the Department of Biomedical Informatics grant support (Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute at the University of Pittsburgh Grant Number UL1-TR-001857). Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the University of Pittsburgh. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Boards at the University of Pittsburgh and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) approved this study. Written informed consent and assent, where appropriate, were obtained from all participants and/or their parents/legal guardians prior to beginning study procedures.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData can be made available upon request.HAIhemagglutination inhibition assayIIVinactivated influenza vaccineccIIV4cell-culture-based inactivated influenza vaccine quadrivalentLAIV4Egg-based live attenuated influenza vaccine quadrivalentEMRElectronic medical recordRDEReceptor-destroying enzymePBSPhosphate-buffered salineCDCCenters for Disease Control and PreventionFDAFood and Drug AdministrationGMTGeometric mean titersGMFRGeometric mean fold riseACIPAdvisory Committee on Immunization PracticePA-SIISPennsylvania Statewide Immunization Information System