RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Approbation of Self-directed Learning by first year medical students: a mixed method study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.08.29.21261700
DO 10.1101/2021.08.29.21261700
A1 Bharti Bhandari
A1 Deepti Chopra
A1 Prerna Agarwal
A1 Aprajita Panwar
A1 Daljit Kaur
A1 Tanvir K Sidhu
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/02/2021.08.29.21261700.abstract
AB Background One of the primary roles played by Indian medical graduates is to be a lifelong learner. For being a lifelong learner, the students should inculcate the habit of Self-Directed Learning (SDL). Lack of SDL skills among undergraduate medical students is a concern, hence the study was planned to introduce SDL in Physiology to phase-1 undergraduate medical students and assess its effectiveness through students’ and faculty’s perceptions.Methodology The project was commenced after obtaining clearance from the Institutional Ethics Committee. The faculty members and students were sensitized on SDL. Feedback questionnaire was framed and the topics for SDL were selected. Six topics were covered as part of the project. The effectiveness of the sessions was evaluated by administering the feedback questionnaire to the students and recording perceptions of the students and faculty on SDL. The quantitative and qualitative analysis of the data was done.Results A total of 96 phase-1 students participated in the study. Majority of the students felt that self-directed learning sessions have improved their SDL skills; they are more prepared and aware of their learning strengths and have started taking ownership of their learning. However some students felt the activity was not sufficient and SDL was not useful in improving their analytical skills. Both the students and the faculty were fairly satisfied by this teaching learning innovation.Conclusions Students and faculty were satisfied with the SDL strategy. SDL has shown to make them independent learner, who are aware of their learning goals and capable of evaluating their learning.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the GIMS Scientific Research Committee and GIMS Ethics Committee. The letter number issued by GIMS Ethics Committee is GIMS/IEC/HR/EFR/2020/03 dated 15.03.2020All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData would be made available by the corresponding author on request.