RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Temporal stability and state-dependence of retrospective self-reports of childhood maltreatment in major depression: a two-year longitudinal analysis of the childhood trauma questionnaire JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.08.31.21262884 DO 10.1101/2021.08.31.21262884 A1 Goltermann, Janik A1 Meinert, Susanne A1 Hülsmann, Carina A1 Dohm, Katharina A1 Grotegerd, Dominik A1 Redlich, Ronny A1 Waltemate, Lena A1 Lemke, Hannah A1 Thiel, Katharina A1 Mehler, David M. A. A1 Enneking, Verena A1 Borgers, Tiana A1 Repple, Jonathan A1 Gruber, Marius A1 Winter, Nils A1 Hahn, Tim A1 Brosch, Katharina A1 Meller, Tina A1 Ringwald, Kai G. A1 Schmitt, Simon A1 Stein, Frederike A1 Pfarr, Julia-Katharina A1 Krug, Axel A1 Nenadić, Igor A1 Kircher, Tilo A1 Opel, Nils A1 Dannlowski, Udo YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/01/2021.08.31.21262884.abstract AB Background Retrospective self-reports of childhood maltreatment are widely used in research and clinical practice. However, their validity has been questioned due to potential depressive bias. Yet, systematic investigations of this matter are sparse. Thus, we investigate if and to what extent retrospective maltreatment reports vary in relation to longitudinal changes in depressive symptomatology.Methods Two-year temporal stability of maltreatment reports was assessed via the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ). Diagnosis and depressive symptoms were assessed using clinical interview and the Beck Depression Inventory. From two independent cohorts (MACS and MNC) we included a total of n=347 major depressive disorder (MDD) patients, n=419 healthy controls (HC), and a subsample with a lifetime first depressive episode between both assessments (n=27). Analysis plan and hypotheses were preregistered prior to data sighting.Results Maltreatment reports were highly stable in HC and MDD patients across both cohorts (ICC=.956; 95%-CI[.949, .963] and ICC=.950; 95%-CI[.933, .963]) and temporal stability did not differ between groups. Stability was lower for cutoff-based maltreatment categorization (K=.551; 95%-CI[.479, .622] and K=.507; 95%-CI[.371, .640]). Baseline maltreatment reports were associated with concurrent and future depression severity. However, longitudinal changes in depression severity predicted variability in CTQ scores only to a small extent across cohorts (b=0.101, p=.009, R2=.021 and b=0.292, p=.320), with the effect being driven by emotional maltreatment subscales.Conclusions Findings suggest that the CTQ provides temporally stable self-reports of childhood maltreatment in healthy and depressed populations, and are only marginally biased by depressive symptomatology. Gradual rather than categorical conceptualization of maltreatment is advised for improving psychometric quality.Competing Interest StatementTilo Kircher received unrestricted educational grants from Servier, Janssen, Recordati, Aristo, Otsuka, neuraxpharm. This funding is not associated with the current work. On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest and nothing to disclose.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/9754h/ Funding StatementThis work is part of the German multicenter consortium 'Neurobiology of Affective Disorders. A translational perspective on brain structure and function', funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG; Forschungsgruppe/Research Unit FOR2107). DFG funding in the context of the FOR2107 was received by: TK (speaker FOR2107; DFG grant numbers KI 588/14-1, KI 588/14-2, KI 588/15-1, KI 588/17-1), UD (co-speaker FOR2107; DA 1151/5-1, DA 1151/5-2, DA 1151/6-1), AK (KR 3822/5-1, KR 3822/7-2), IN (NE 2254/1-2), TH (HA 7070/2-2, HA7070/3, HA7070/4). This work was further supported by the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) of the medical faculty of Munster (Grant Dan3/012/17 to UD and SEED 11/19 to NO). EL was additionally supported by the Christiane Nuesslein-Vollhard Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The MNC was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of University of Munster (2007-307-f-S). The MACS was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Medical Faculties, University of Marburg (AZ: 07/14) and University of Munster (AZ: 2014-422-b-S). The study was performed in accordance with the ethical guidelines and regulations. All participants gave written informed consent prior to examination and received financial compensation.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/9754h/, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/9754H. https://osf.io/9754h/ CTQChildhood Trauma QuestionnaireHChealthy controlsMACSMarburg-Münster Affective Disorders Cohort StudyMDDmajor depressive disorderMNCMünster Neuroimaging Cohort