PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Abraham D. Flaxman AU - Rodal Issema AU - Ruanne V. Barnabas AU - Jennifer M. Ross TI - Health impact and cost of COVID-19 prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies AID - 10.1101/2021.08.31.21262923 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.08.31.21262923 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/01/2021.08.31.21262923.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/01/2021.08.31.21262923.full AB - Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to over 600,000 deaths in the United States and continues to disrupt lives even as effective vaccines are available. We aimed to estimate the impact and health system cost of implementing post-exposure prophylaxis against household exposure to COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies.Methods We developed a decision-analytical model analysis of results from a recent randomized controlled trial with complementary data on household demographic structure, vaccine coverage, and COVID-19 confirmed case counts for the representative month of May, 2021. The model population includes individuals of all ages in the United States by sex and race/ethnicity.Results In a month of similar intensity to May, 2021, in the USA, a monoclonal antibody post-exposure prophylaxis program reaching 50% of exposed unvaccinated household members aged 50+, would avert 1,813 (1,171 – 2,456) symptomatic infections, 526 (343 - 716) hospitalizations, and 83 (56 - 116) deaths. Assuming the unit cost of administering the intervention was US$ 1,264, this program would save the health system US$ 3,055,202 (−14,034,632 - 18,787,692).Conclusions Currently in the United States, health system and public health actors have an opportunity to improve health and reduce costs through COVID-19 post-exposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies.Competing Interest StatementADF has consulted recently for Janssen; SwissRe; Sanofi; Merck for Mothers; and Agathos, Ltd. Other authors have no competing interested to disclose.Funding StatementThis work was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (award DMS-1839116).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:These research activities used no identifiable private information and were therefore exempt from institutional board review.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe analysis used publicly-available data. The code for the analysis is published in a replication archive at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338919. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338919