TY - JOUR T1 - Short Term Reduction in the Odds of Testing Positive for SARS-CoV-2; a Comparison Between Two Doses and Three doses of the BNT162b2 Vaccine JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.08.29.21262792 SP - 2021.08.29.21262792 AU - Tal Patalon AU - Sivan Gazit AU - Virginia E. Pitzer AU - Ottavia Prunas AU - Joshua L. Warren AU - Daniel M. Weinberger Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/31/2021.08.29.21262792.abstract N2 - With the evidence of waning immunity of the BNT162b2 vaccine, a national third dose vaccination campaign was initiated in Israel during August 2021; other countries have announced their intention to administer a booster shot as well. Leveraging data from Maccabi Healthcare Services, we conducted a preliminary retrospective study aimed at evaluating initial short-term effectiveness of a three dose versus a two dose regimen against infection due to the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, using two complementary approaches; a test-negative design and a matched case-control design. We found that 7-13 days after the booster shot there is a 48-68% reduction in the odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and that 14-20 days after the booster the marginal effectiveness increases to 70-84%. Further studies are needed to determine the duration of protection conferred by the third dose and its effect on severe disease.Competing Interest StatementConflicts of interest: DMW has received consulting fees from Pfizer, Merck, Affinivax, and Matrivax for work unrelated to this paper and is Principal Investigator on grants from Pfizer and Merck to Yale University for work unrelated to this manuscript. VEP has received reimbursement from Merck and Pfizer for travel to Scientific Input Engagements unrelated to the topic of this manuscript and is a member of the WHO Immunization and Vaccine-related Implementation Research Advisory Committee (IVIR-AC). JW discloses consulting fees from Revelar Inc.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by NIAID of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01AI137093. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the MHS (Maccabi Healthcare Services) Institutional Review Board. Due to the retrospective design of the study, informed consent was waived by the IRB and all identifying details of the participants were removed before computational analysis.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAccording to the Israel Ministry of Health regulations, individual-level data cannot be shared openly. Specific requests for remote access to de-identified community-level data should be referred to KSM, Maccabi Healthcare Services Research and Innovation Center. ER -