RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of Object Detection Approaches Applied to Field Images of Papanicolaou Stained Cytology Slides
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.08.25.21262605
DO 10.1101/2021.08.25.21262605
A1 André Victória Matias
A1 Allan Cerentini
A1 Luiz Antonio Buschetto Macarini
A1 João Gustavo Atkinson Amorim
A1 Felipe Perozzo Daltoé
A1 Aldo von Wangenheim
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/30/2021.08.25.21262605.abstract
AB Papanicolaou is an inexpensive and non-invasive method, generally applied to detect cervical cancer, that can also be useful to detect cancer on oral cavities. Although oral cancer is considered a global health issue with 350.000 people diagnosed over a year it can successfully be treated if diagnosed at early stages. The manual process of analyzing cells to detect abnormalities is time-consuming and subject to variations in perceptions from different professionals. To evaluate a possible solution to the automation of this process, in this paper we employ the object detection deep learning approach in the analysis of this type of image using 3 models: RetinaNet, Faster R-CNN, and Mask R-CNN. We trained and tested the models using images from 6 cytology slides (4 cancer cases and 2 healthy samples) and our results show that Mask R-CNN was the best model for localization and classification of nuclei with an IoU of 0.51 and recall of abnormal nuclei of 0.67.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe want to thank Fundação de Amparo à); Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina (Fapesc) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) for funding this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research was approved by the UFSC Research Ethics Committee (CEPSH), protocol number 23193719.5.0000.0121. All patients were previously approached and informed about the study objectives. Those who agreed to participate signed an Informed Consent Form.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesWe used the UFSC OCPap (v3) dataset, available at https://arquivos.ufsc.br/d/5035aec3c24f421a95d0/, to train and validate the models. https://arquivos.ufsc.br/d/5035aec3c24f421a95d0/