PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Elise Paul
AU  - Daisy Fancourt
AU  - Mohammad Razai
TI  - Racial discrimination and covid-19 vaccine uptake: is mistrust of the health service behind vaccine refusal?
AID  - 10.1101/2021.08.26.21262655
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.08.26.21262655
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/28/2021.08.26.21262655.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/28/2021.08.26.21262655.full
AB  - Objectives To assess the role of racial and ethnic discrimination in determining covid-19 vaccine refusal in ethnic minority groups.Design Population based cohort study.Setting Survey data from the University College London COVID-19 Social Study.Participants Data from 633 adults belonging to ethnic minority groups who took part in the study from 23 July 2020 to 14 June 2021 were included. Experiences of racial/ethnic discrimination occurring since the start of the first lockdown were collected in the last week of July 2020. Structural equation modelling was used to model the direct effect of racial/ethnic discrimination on covid-19 vaccine refusal, as well as the indirect effects through low trust in the central UK government and the UK health service to handle the pandemic. The model adjusted for a range of demographic and covid-19-related covariates.Main outcome measures Data on covid-19 vaccination status was collected from 23 December 2020 to 14 June 2021 and operationalised as having had or agreed to have at least one dose versus having been offered but turned it down (refusal).Results Nearly one in ten (6.7%) who had refused a covid-19 vaccine reported having experienced racial/ethnic discrimination in a medical setting since the start of the pandemic and had experienced twice as many incidents of racial/ethnic discrimination than those who had accepted the vaccine. The total effect of racial/ethnic discrimination on refusing a covid-19 vaccine was nearly 4-fold (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4 to 10.9) and was mediated by low trust in the health system to handle the pandemic (indirect effect: OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.1 to 5.4).Conclusions Findings underscore the importance of addressing racial/ethnic discrimination in order to increase covid-19 vaccine uptake amongst ethnic minority adults. The results also highlight the crucial role the National Health Service must play in regaining trust from ethnic minority groups in order to overcome vaccine hesitancy.What is already known on this topic Covid-19 vaccine refusal is higher in ethnic minority groups than in white British adults in the UK. Prior research suggests experiences of racial/ethnic discrimination and mistrust of government and the health system are barriers to uptake. However, longitudinal research examining whether the influence of racial/ethnic discrimination on covid-19 vaccine refusal is mediated by government and health system trust is lacking.What this study adds Experiences of racial/ethnic discrimination increased the likelihood of subsequent covid-19 vaccine refusal nearly 4-fold. This effect was mediated by low trust in the healthcare system, but not the government, to handle the pandemic.Findings support addressing issues of mistrust in the healthcare system and discrimination in order to increase vaccine uptake in ethnic minority adults in the UK.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Nuffield Foundation [DF, WEL/FR-000022583], the MARCH Mental Health Network funded by the Cross-Disciplinary Mental Health Network Plus initiative supported by UK Research and Innovation [DF, ES/S002588/1], and the Wellcome Trust [DF, 221400/Z/20/Z and DF, 205407/Z/16/Z]. MSR is funded by the NIHR. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics statement The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. The study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee [12467/005] and all participants gave informed consent. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe study protocol and user guide (which includes full details on recruitment, retention, data cleaning, and sample demographics) are available at https://github.com/UCL-BSH/CSSUserGuide.