TY - JOUR T1 - SARS-CoV-2 variants: levels of neutralisation required for protective immunity JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.08.11.21261876 SP - 2021.08.11.21261876 AU - Deborah Cromer AU - Megan Steain AU - Arnold Reynaldi AU - Timothy E Schlub AU - Adam K Wheatley AU - Jennifer A Juno AU - Stephen J Kent AU - James A Triccas AU - David S Khoury AU - Miles P Davenport Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/13/2021.08.11.21261876.abstract N2 - A number of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) have been identified that partially escape serum neutralisation activity elicited by current vaccines. Recent studies have also shown that vaccines demonstrate reduced protection against symptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 variants. Here we integrate published data on in vitro neutralisation and clinical protection to understand and predict vaccine efficacy against existing SARS-CoV-2 variants. We find that neutralising activity against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 is highly predictive of neutralisation of the VOC, with all vaccines showing a similar drop in neutralisation to the variants. Neutralisation levels remain strongly correlated with protection from infection with SARS-CoV-2 VOC (r=0.81, p=0.0005). We apply an existing model relating in vitro neutralisation to protection (parameterised on data from ancestral virus infection) and find this remains predictive of vaccine efficacy against VOC once drops in neutralisation to the VOC are taken into account. Modelling of predicted vaccine efficacy against variants over time suggests that protection against symptomatic infection may drop below 50% within the first year after vaccination for some current vaccines. Boosting of previously infected individuals with existing vaccines (which target ancestral virus) has been shown to significantly increase neutralising antibodies. Our modelling suggests that booster vaccination should enable high levels of immunity that prevent severe infection outcomes with the current SARS-CoV-2 VOC, at least in the medium term.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work is supported by an Australian government Medical Research Future Fund awards GNT2002073 (to MPD, SJK, AKW), MRF2005544 (to SJK, AKW, JAJ and MPD), MRF2005760 (to MPD), MRF2007221 (to JAT and MS), an NHMRC program grant GNT1149990 (SJK and MPD), and the Victorian Government (SJK, AKW, JAJ). JAJ, DSK and SJK are supported by NHMRC fellowships. AKW, DC and MPD are supported by NHMRC Investigator grants.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This work was approved under the UNSW Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (approval HC200242).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data and code will be made freely available on GitHub upon publication. ER -