TY - JOUR T1 - Assessing the sustainability of an integrated rural sanitation and hygiene approach: A repeated cross-sectional evaluation in 10 countries JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.08.11.21261919 SP - 2021.08.11.21261919 AU - Paschal A. Apanga AU - Matthew C. Freeman AU - Zoe Sakas AU - Joshua V. Garn Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/13/2021.08.11.21261919.abstract N2 - Introduction While many studies have implemented programs to increase sanitation coverage throughout the world, there are limited rigorous studies on the sustainability of these sanitation programs.Methods Between 2014 and 2018, the rural Sustainable Sanitation and Hygiene for All (SSH4A) approach was implemented by SNV in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. Repeated cross-sectional household surveys were administered annually throughout program implementation, and 1-to-2-years following completion of program activities. We characterize to what extent sanitation coverage was sustained 1-2 years after implementation of this SSH4A intervention.Results Surveys were conducted in 12 program areas in 10 countries, with 22,666 households receiving a post-implementation survey. Six of 12 program areas (Bhutan, Ghana, Kenya, both Nepal sites, and Tanzania) had similar coverage levels of basic sanitation 1-to-2-years post-implementation, whereas there were varied levels of slippage in the other program areas (both Ethiopia sites, Indonesia, Mozambique, Uganda, and Zambia), ranging from a drop of 63 percentage points in coverage in Ethiopia to a drop of only 4 percentage points in Indonesia. In countries that experienced losses in the coverage of household sanitation, generally sanitation sharing among neighbors did not increase, whereas open defecation did increase. In each of the areas where slippage occurred, the sanitation coverage levels at the final time point were all still higher than the initial time point before SNV started working in these areas. We found a number of factors to be associated with the sustainability of sanitation coverage, including household socio-economic status, having household members with disabilities, baseline sanitation coverage levels of the program areas, and rate of change of coverage during program activities.Conclusions Data revealed sustained gains in sanitation coverage in some program areas, yet slippage in other areas. This work may serve to benchmark sustainability of sanitation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia.Competing Interest StatementThe authors received funding from SNV to perform this evaluation. All analyses were performed solely by JVG and PAA following the analytic plan. The authors declare no other competing interests exist.Funding StatementThe authors received funding from the SNV to perform this evaluation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study authors received deidentified data to perform this study. Research Integrity at the University of Nevada, Reno reviewed the study and determined that it does not require human research protection oversight by the IRB (1378687-1). SNV received approval from each of the individual countries to collect the data. Trained enumerators collected data from adult members of the household. Informed consent and protecting data anonymity were carried out by SNV for every survey.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available upon reasonable request. ER -