RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Beyond Black vs White: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Chronic Pain including Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and Multiracial U.S. Adults JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.08.10.21261852 DO 10.1101/2021.08.10.21261852 A1 Anna Zajacova A1 Hanna Grol-Prokopczyk A1 Roger Fillingim YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/11/2021.08.10.21261852.abstract AB Previous literature on race/ethnicity and pain has rarely included all major U.S. racial groups or examined the sensitivity of findings to different pain operationalizations. Using data from the 2010-2018 National Health Interview Surveys on adults 18+ (N=273,972), we calculate the weighted prevalence of six definitions of pain to provide a detailed description of chronic pain in White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and multiracial groups. We also estimate logistic models to obtain relative disparities, including net of demographic and socioeconomic (SES) factors; finally, we calculate average predicted probabilities to show prevalence disparities in absolute terms. We find that Asian Americans have the lowest pain prevalence across all pain definitions or model specifications. In contrast, Native American and multiracial adults have the highest pain prevalence. This pain excess is due to the lower SES among Native Americans but remains significant and unexplained among multiracial adults. Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics fall in between. In this trio, Hispanics have the lowest prevalence, an advantage not attributable to immigrant status or SES. While most prior research focused on Black-White comparisons, these two groups differ relatively little. Blacks report lower prevalence of less severe pain definitions than Whites, but higher prevalence of severe pain. Net of SES, however, Blacks have significantly lower pain across all definitions. Overall, racial disparities are larger than previously recognized once all major racial groups are included, and these disparities are largely consistent across different operationalizations of pain.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01AG065351 (PI: Grol-Prokopczyk), and by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Insight Grant (PI: Zajacova). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or SSHRC.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The data are publicly-available and de-identified. As such, there are no human subjects and IRB exemption or approval is not necessary.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data in this analysis are all publicly available at https://nhis.ipums.org/nhis/ https://nhis.ipums.org/nhis/