RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Precision of Mammogram and USG based evaluation of NAST response in breast cancer and its impact on oncoplastic surgery decisions
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.08.06.21261694
DO 10.1101/2021.08.06.21261694
A1 Pooja Deshpande
A1 Santosh Dixit
A1 Devaki Kelkar
A1 Nutan Gangurde
A1 Shahin Shaikh
A1 Sanket Nagarkar
A1 Smeeta Nare
A1 Laleh Busheri
A1 Chaitanyanand Koppiker
A1 Beenu Varghese
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/08/2021.08.06.21261694.abstract
AB Background Precise prediction of residual tumour size following neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer is crucial in assessing response and surgical decision making. Our study is aimed at assessing the performance of conventional imaging modalities like ultrasound and mammography in predicting the residual tumour size after neoadjuvant systemic therapy and in evaluating the impact of imaging on the surgical outcomes.Methods We retrospectively compared the tumour size measured by ultrasonography and mammography and the residual tumour size on final histopathology in 109 patients. Concordance was defined as a size difference within 25% of the histopathology size. We also looked at the distribution of concordance between different T status and molecular subtypes, accuracy of USG in predicting pathological complete response and axillary lymph nodal metastasis and also surgical outcomes in the discordant cases.Results The concordance rates of mammography and ultrasonography were 68.2% and 52.3% respectively without statistically significant difference between the two modalities (p = 0.081). Combination of both the modalities had a concordance rate of 57.8%. Ultrasonography had accuracy of 81.7% for predicting pathological complete response and 79.8% for predicting axillary nodal metastasis. We did not identify any influence of histologic subtype on the associations between preoperative measurements and pathology size or the accuracy for detecting pathological complete response (p values 0.43 and 0.46 respectively). In 12 cases, the radiology-pathology discordance could have led to large excision volume surgeries. In the overall cohort, recurrence free survival and overall survival rates at median follow up of 19.1 month were 87.2% and 95.4% respectively.Conclusions Ultrasound and mammography showed moderate concordance with pathology for estimation of the residual tumour size without any significant difference in the performance between the two. Despite the moderate concordance, surgical outcomes were fairly well managed in the discordant cases with the oncoplastic surgical techniques. Our study highlights the usefulness of the cheaper and widely available conventional imaging modalities in the developing countries where the cost of treatment is to be contained.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe research was funded by Bajaj Auto Ltd. for providing support to research activities at Prashanti Cancer Care Mission, Pune (PCCM529).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:An Independent ethics committee at Prashanti Cancer Care mission. Registration number: ECR/298/Indt/MH/2018All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data available related to the manuscript will be available on request after consultation with the institutional ethical committee.