PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Giang Thu Vu
AU  - Thuc Minh Thi Vu
AU  - Robin van Kessel
AU  - Brian Li Han Wong
AU  - Tham Thi Nguyen
AU  - Thao Phuong Thi Nguyen
AU  - Son Hoang Nguyen
AU  - Ha Ngoc Do
AU  - Bach Xuan Tran
AU  - Carl A. Latkin
AU  - Cyrus Ho
AU  - Roger Ho
TI  - Factorial Structure of the Transactional eHealth Literacy Among Vietnamese Youth: An Instrument Validation Study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.08.06.21261688
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.08.06.21261688
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/07/2021.08.06.21261688.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/07/2021.08.06.21261688.full
AB  - The progression into the Digital Age has brought an array of novel skill requirements. Unlike traditional literacy, there are currently few measures that can reliably measure eHealth literacy. The Transactional Model of eHealth Literacy and subsequent Transactional eHealth Literacy Instrument may provide a feasible option for measuring eHealth literacy. However, this instrument has yet to be validated, which is the aim of this study. We conducted an online cross-sectional study among 236 Vietnamese young people. Using exploratory factor analysis, we ensured that a model consisting of four factors had the best fit (RMSEA = 0.116; CFI = 0.907) and the highest internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.96). A confirmatory factor analysis tested measurement invariance at four levels: configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariance. Only metric invariance was partially invariant, while the rest tested fully invariant. Even with partial metric invariance, there is reason to assume that functional, communicative, critical, and translational eHealth literacy (the four levels according to the transactional model) are consistently measured when deploying the Transactional eHealth Literacy Instrument across groups. In other words, this study suggests the instrument can be used for comparisons across groups and has the potential to generate high-quality data usable for informing change agents as to whether a particular population is proficient enough to adopt novel eHealth innovations.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was acquired for this article.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional review board of Youth Research Institute, VietnamAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNot available