RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Association between physical exercise interventions and functional capacity in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.29.21261331
DO 10.1101/2021.07.29.21261331
A1 Lucinéia Orsolin Pfeifer
A1 Angélica Trevisan De Nardi
A1 Larissa Xavier Neves da Silva
A1 Cíntia Ehlers Botton
A1 Daniela Meirelles do Nascimento
A1 Juliana Lopes Teodoro
A1 Beatriz D. Schaan
A1 Daniel Umpierre
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/31/2021.07.29.21261331.abstract
AB Background The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus increases with age and people with type 2 diabetes are more affected by reductions in functional performance. Although exercise interventions are recommended for people with diabetes, it is relevant to assess the effects of different training modes on the available functional outcomes.Objective To summarize the effects of distinct modes of exercise training in comparison to non-exercise on the functional capacity of adults with type 2 diabetes.Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized (RCT) and non-randomized (NRS) controlled trials was conducted. Seven databases were searched from inception to January 2021. Eligible studies should last 8 weeks or longer, comparing structured exercise training and non-exercise control for one out of six pre-specified functional capacity outcomes (Timed Up and Go test, chair stands, walking performance, upper limb muscle strength, lower limb muscle strength, physical fitness parameter), in patients with type 2 diabetes, aged ≥45 years or older. The risk of biases was assessed with the Checklist Downs & Black. Pooled mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model, followed by sensitivity and meta-regression analyses.Results Of 17165 references retrieved, 29 trials (1557 patients) were included. Among these, 13 studies used aerobic training, 6 studies used combined training, 4 studies used resistance training, 3 studies had multiple intervention arms and 3 studies used other types of training. Exercise training was associated with an increase in functional capacity outcomes, as reflected by changes in 6-minute-walk test (51.6 meters; 95% CI 7.6% to 95.6%; I2 92%), one-repetition maximum leg-press (18.0 kg; 95% CI 4.0% to 31.9%; I2 0%), and peak oxygen consumption (2.41 mL/kg·min; 95% CI 1.89% to 2.92%; I2 100%) compared with control groups. In sensitivity and subgroup analyses using VO2max as outcome and stratified by for the type of study (RCT or NRS), duration of diabetes diagnosis, and sex, we observed overlapping confidence intervals. Meta-regression showed no association between HbA1C levels and VO2max (p = 0.34; I2 99.6%; R² = 2.6%).Conclusion Structured exercise training based on aerobic training, resistance training, combination of both, or composed by other types of training (i.e. Pilates, Tai Chi and Whole-body vibration) is associated with an improvement in functional capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes, except for the upper limb muscle strength. However, we could not identify potential effect predictors associated with directional summary estimates.Registration This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42020162467); date of registration: 12/15/2019. The review protocol is hosted at the Open Science Framework (OSF) (Preprint DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/kpg2m).Funding This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001; National Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS) – FAPERGS/Brasil; National Council on Technology and Scientific Development (CNPq).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/kpg2m Funding StatementThis study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001; National Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS) – FAPERGS/Brasil; National Council on Technology and Scientific Development (CNPq).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:not applicable as it is a systematic reviewAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data and analytic codes used in the meta-analyses and the scripts used to generate the meta-analysis are available with the other materials in the OSF (https://osf.io/h47r8/). https://osf.io/h47r8/