RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Effect of dialysis modality on the survival of end-stage renal disease patients starting dialysis in Sabah from 2007 to 2017: a retrospective cohort study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.26.21261164
DO 10.1101/2021.07.26.21261164
A1 Keowmani, Thamron
A1 Ghazali, Anis Kausar
A1 Yaacob, Najib Majdi
A1 Wong, Koh Wei
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/29/2021.07.26.21261164.abstract
AB Background The effect of dialysis modality on the survival of end-stage renal disease patients is a major public health interest.Methods In this retrospective cohort study, all adult end-stage renal disease patients receiving dialysis treatment in Sabah between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017 as identified from the Malaysian Dialysis and Transplant Registry were evaluated and followed up through December 31, 2018. The endpoint was all-cause mortality. The observation time was defined as the time from the date of dialysis initiation after the onset of end-stage renal disease to whichever of the following that came first: date of death, date of transplantation, date of last follow-up, date of recovered kidney function, or December 31, 2018. Weighted Cox regression was used to estimate the effect of dialysis modality. Analyses were restricted to patients with complete data on all variables.Results 1,837 patients began hemodialysis and 156 patients started with peritoneal dialysis, yielding 7,548.10 (potential median 5.48 years/person) and 747.98 (potential median 5.68 years/person) person-years of observation. 3.1% of patients were lost to follow-up. The median survival time was 5.8 years (95% confidence interval: 5.4, 6.3) among patients who started on hemodialysis and 7.0 years (95% confidence interval: 5.9, indeterminate) among those who started on peritoneal dialysis. The effect of dialysis modality was not significant after controlling for confounders. The average hazard ratio was 0.80 (95% confidence interval: 0.61, 1.05) with hemodialysis as a reference.Conclusion There was no evidence of a difference in mortality between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSelf-funded.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study has been approved by Medical Research & Ethics Committee (MREC) and the Human Research Ethics Committee USM (HREC). The registration numbers were NMRR-19-1120-48161 (IIR) and USM/JEPeM/19120840, respectively.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.