RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Heterogeneous Mental Health Development During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.02.24.21251565 DO 10.1101/2021.02.24.21251565 A1 Lea Ellwardt A1 Patrick Präg YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/27/2021.02.24.21251565.abstract AB The COVID-19 pandemic and the mitigation measures by governments have upended the economic and social lives of many, leading to widespread psychological distress. We explore heterogeneity in trajectories of psychological distress during the pandemic in the United Kingdom and relate this heterogeneity to socio-demographic and health factors. We analyze nine waves of longitudinal, nationally representative survey data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (N =15,914), covering the period from early 2020 to mid-2021. First, latent class mixture modelling (LCCM) is used to identify trajectories of psychological distress. Second, associations of the trajectories with covariates are tested with multinomial logistic regressions. We find four different trajectories of distress: continuously low, temporarily elevated, repeatedly elevated, and continuously elevated distress. Nearly two fifths of the population experienced severely elevated risks of distress during the pandemic. Long-term distress was highest among younger people, women, people living without a partner, those who had no work or lost income, and those with previous health conditions or COVID-19 symptoms. Given the threat of persistent stress on health, policy measures should be sensitized to the unintended yet far-reaching consequences of non-pharmaceutical interventions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementPatrick Praeg is supported by a grant of the French National Research Agency (ANR), 'Investissements d'Avenir' (LabEx Ecodec/ANR-11-LABX-0047).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Essex Ethics Committee approved all data collection for the Understanding Society main survey and COVID waves, which were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All survey participants provided fully informed consent. No additional ethical approval was necessary for this secondary data analysis. We received approval from the database owners to access the data for this study. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data analyzed in this study are publicly available (University of Essex and Institute for Social and Economic Research, 2021) and a replication package can be found on-line (Ellwardt and Praeg, 2021). https://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZXQE6