RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Online user comments responding to deemed consent organ donor legislation in Nova Scotia: a divided public or a few loud voices?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.24.21260542
DO 10.1101/2021.07.24.21260542
A1 Marcon, Alessandro R.
A1 Wagner, Darren N.
A1 Rachul, Christen
A1 Weiss, Matthew J.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/26/2021.07.24.21260542.abstract
AB Background The Canadian province of Nova Scotia recently became the first jurisdiction in North America to pass deemed consent organ donation legislation. This change in legislation generated substantial online discussion, which we analyzed to provide insights on public perception.Methods We performed directed content analysis on 2663 user-generated comments appearing on two widely-shared Canadian Broadcasting Company (CBC) articles published online in April 2019. We determined levels of support and opposition in comments and described the specific rhetoric used for doing so. We also performed one-way ANOVA and Pearson chi-square tests to determine how the comments were being received and engaged by other users.Results A range of commentary was present in both support and opposition to the changes in legislation. There were more negative than positive comments, and negative commentary generated more replies. Positive comments were received more positively by other users, while negative comments were received more negatively. The total sum of negative comments was greatly influenced by a small number of very active participants. Negative commentary focused more on broad concepts and principles related to government, power, and individual rights rather than specific issues in the Nova Scotian context. Substantial issues of trust in the government and healthcare system were evident.Conclusions There were strong positive and negative sentiments expressed in the comments, but the total sum of negativity in the comments was significantly influenced by a small number of commentators. Analysis on the presumed consent concerns can be helpful to inform public outreach efforts.Implication Statement This research is the first to examine the robust online commentary regarding reactions to Nova Scotia’s recently-passed deemed consent organ donation law. Our analysis provides extensive detail on the commentary in favour and in opposition to the new law, which has relevance for understanding public perception and designing public outreach.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors thank and acknowledge Health Canada, Genome Canada, Genome Alberta, and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research for their generous support of Legislative Strategies to Improve Deceased Organ Donation in Canada: A Special Focus on Evaluating the Impact of Opt-Out Legislation in Canada LEADDeR and Precision Medicine CanPREVENT AMR: Applying Precision Medicine Technologies in Canada to Prevent Antibody Mediated Rejection and Premature Kidney Transplant Loss.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The user comments analyzed here consist of publicly shared media content, and ethics approval was therefore not required. Nonetheless, no usernames appear in this report to help protect privacy.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data relied upon in the article is appended within the submission. Any request for raw data can be addressed to the corresponding author.