PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Van Belle, Sylvia
AU  - Dahlén, Amelia
AU  - Schiöth, Helgi B.
AU  - Brooks, Samantha J.
TI  - Profiling lockdown adherence and poor coping responses towards the COVID-19 crisis in an international cross-sectional survey
AID  - 10.1101/2021.07.21.21260910
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.07.21.21260910
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/24/2021.07.21.21260910.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/24/2021.07.21.21260910.full
AB  - This study uses international respondents to a COVID-lockdown related questionnaire (n = 1,688) to assess the determinants of adherence and poor coping in response to lockdown measures. A regression analysis was used to compare the relative importance of clusters derived from a K-means cluster analysis as well as various demographics (age, gender, level of education, political affiliation, a factor reflecting social security and a factor reflecting the lockdown harshness). Three distinct clusters (“General Population”, “Extreme Responders” and “Sufferers) were identified, corresponding well to a previous study. Clusters appeared to be the best overall predictors of coping and adherence although gender, political affiliation and lockdown harshness were also important predictors. The large proportion of variance that remains unexplained, combined with the relatively weak effects of traditional demographics, suggest that less concrete variables such as personality traits, health and environmental factors may be better predictors of adherence and coping during a pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by Liverpool John Moores University, UK Research Ethics Committee (UREC ref: 20/NSP/035).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData has been deposited at Dryad and will be made available on publication https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qv9s4mwfc