TY - JOUR T1 - Laboratory study to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic dressing to detect burn wound infection JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.07.21.21260922 SP - 2021.07.21.21260922 AU - N.T. Thet AU - A.T.A. Jenkins AU - J.D. Mercer-Chalmers AU - K. Coy AU - S. Booth AU - D. Collins AU - S. Bremner AU - F. Spickett-Jones AU - R. Greenwood AU - A.E. Young Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/23/2021.07.21.21260922.abstract N2 - Burn Wound Infection (BWI) is difficult to define and detect before it manifests with clear clinical symptoms. In this paper, an ex vivo study of a prototype BWI detecting wound dressing is reported. Consenting patients with burns were recruited from four burns services in the United Kingdom, their burn infection state recorded at time of recruitment and retrospectively following treatment. Their wound dressings were used as a source of inoculating bacteria to create an ex vivo biofilm model in the laboratory with reasonable fidelity to the original microbial state of their wound. The prototype infection detecting wound dressing, which responds to cytolytic toxins secreted by bacteria, was placed on the ex vivo biofilm and the response of the dressing correlated with the clinical decision on the patient’s wound infection state. The study illustrated a number of broader issues with clinical BWI diagnosis, notably the absence of objective diagnostic criteria: a ‘reference standard’ for BWI. The absence of such a reference standard made analysis of the relationship between the dressing response and BWI diagnosis challenging, however a point estimate of 68% sensitivity from the study suggests the potential future utility of using a sensor which detects secreted bacterial virulence factors to assist in BWI diagnosis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialISRCTN13825483Funding StatementThe authors thank The Annette Charitable Trust, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Grant, references: EP/R51164X/1 and Medical Research Council Grant: MR/N006496/11 and MC_PC_141232 for funding this studyAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approved by the South West UK REC - Cornwall & Plymouth Research Ethics Committee: reference 16/SW/0238.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAdditional data available through Dryad repository: DOI https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.79cnp5htr https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.79cnp5htr ER -