PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Monteiro, Silvia AU - Rente, Daniela AU - Cunha, Mónica V. AU - Marques, Tiago A. AU - Cardoso, Eugénia AU - Álvaro, Pedro AU - Vilaça, João AU - Ribeiro, Jorge AU - Silva, Marco AU - Coelho, Norberta AU - Brôco, Nuno AU - Carvalho, Marta AU - Santos, Ricardo TI - Concentration of SARS-CoV-2 from large volumes of raw wastewater is enhanced with the inuvai R180 system AID - 10.1101/2021.07.21.21260907 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.07.21.21260907 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/22/2021.07.21.21260907.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/22/2021.07.21.21260907.full AB - Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) for severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a powerful tool to complement syndromic surveillance: first, as an early-warning system for the spread of the virus in the community, second, to find hotspots of infection, and third, to aid in the early detection and follow-up of circulating virus variants.Although detection of SARS-CoV-2 in raw wastewater may be prompted with good recoveries during periods of high community prevalence, in the early stages of population outbreaks concentration procedures are required to overcome low viral concentrations. Several methods have become available for the recovery of SARS-CoV-2 from raw wastewater, generally involving filtration. However, these methods are limited to small sample volumes, possibly missing the early stages of virus circulation, and restrained applicability across different water matrices. The aim of this study was thus to evaluate the performance of three methods enabling the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 from large volumes of wastewater: i) hollow fiber filtration using the inuvai R180, with an enhanced elution protocol and polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation; ii) PEG precipitation; and iii) skimmed milk flocculation. The performance of the three approaches was evaluated in wastewater from multiple wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) with distinct singularities, according to: i) effective volume; ii) percentage of recovery; iii) extraction efficiency; iv) inhibitory effect; and v) the limits of detection and quantification (The inuvai R180 system had the best performance, with detection of spiked controls across all samples, average recovery percentages of 64% for SARS-CoV-2 control and 68% for porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), with low variability.The inuvai R180 enables the scalability of volumes without negative impact on the costs, time for analysis, and recovery/inhibition. Moreover, hollow fiber filters favor the concentration of different microbial taxonomic groups. Such combined features make this technology attractive for usage in environmental waters monitoring.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by Programa Operacional de Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (POCI) (FEDER component), Programa Operacional Regional de Lisboa, and Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (Project COVIDETECT, ref. 048467).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:I confirm that all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and no ethics committee approvals was necessaryAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data contained in this manuscript has not been peer reviewed, published or accepted in any other platform