PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - McGurgan, P
AU  - Calvert, K.
AU  - Narula, K.
AU  - Nathan, E.
AU  - Celenza, A.
AU  - Jorm, C.
TI  - Why is patient safety a challenge? Insights from the Professionalism Opinions of Medical Students’ (PoMS) Research
AID  - 10.1101/2021.07.20.21260739
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.07.20.21260739
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/22/2021.07.20.21260739.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/22/2021.07.20.21260739.full
AB  - Introduction Despite increased emphasis on education and training for patient safety in medical schools, there is little known about factors influencing decision making regarding patient safety behaviours. This study examined the nature and magnitude of factors which may influence opinions around patient safety related behaviours as a means of providing insights into how Australian doctors and medical students view these issues relative to members of the public.Methods A national, multicentre, prospective, on-line cross sectional survey was conducted using responses to hypothetical clinical scenarios. Three cohorts were surveyed - Australian enrolled medical students, medical doctors and members of the public.Participant responses were compared for the different contextual variables within the scenarios and the participants’ demographic characteristics – student, doctor, member of the public, gender and age (if public or doctors)/ seniority in the course (if a medical student).Results In total there were 2602 medical student participants, 809 doctors and 503 members of the Australian public. Medical doctors were more likely than other cohorts to have statistically significant differences in how they viewed the acceptability of patient safety related behaviours; doctors were more tolerant of medical students not reporting concerning behaviours. Medical students’ opinions frequently demonstrated a ‘transition effect’, bridging between the doctors and publics’ attitudes, consistent with professional identity formation.Conclusions Opinions on the acceptability of medical students’ patient safety related behaviours were influenced by the demographics of the cohort and the contextual complexity of the scenario. Although the survey used hypothetical scenarios, doctors and medical students’ opinions appear to be influenced by cognitive dissonances, biases and heuristics which may negatively affect patient safety.‘Opinion is the medium between knowledge and ignorance’ PlatoCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialAustralian enrolled medical students (HREC RA/4/1/8014), Australian medical doctors (HREC RA/4/1/9195), and Australian public (HREC RA/4/1/9278).Funding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from UWA for each of the three recruitment cohorts: Australian enrolled medical students (HREC RA/4/1/8014), Australian medical doctors (HREC RA/4/1/9195), and Australian public (HREC RA/4/1/9278).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNot available on other sites at present