RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 IT ambidexterity driven patient agility and hospital patient service performance: a variance approach
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.20.21258538
DO 10.1101/2021.07.20.21258538
A1 Rogier van de Wetering
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/22/2021.07.20.21258538.abstract
AB Hospitals are currently exploring digital options to transform their clinical procedures and their overall engagement with patients. This paper investigates how hospital departments can leverage the ability of firms to simultaneously explore new IT resources and practices (IT exploration) as well as exploit their current IT resources and practices (IT exploitation), i.e., IT ambidexterity, to adequately sense and respond to patients’ needs and demands, i.e., patient agility. This study embraces the dynamic capability view and develops a research model, and tests it accordingly using cross-sectional data from 90 clinical hospital departments from the Netherlands through an online survey. The model’s hypothesized relationships are tested using Partial Least Squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM). The outcomes demonstrate the significance of IT ambidexterity in developing patient agility, positively influencing patient service performance. The study outcomes support the theorized model can the outcomes shed light on how to transform clinical practice and drive patient agility.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Open University has a Research Ethics Committee (cETO) that assesses ethical aspects of studies. The Faculty of Science (of which I am part) does not have such an obligation to run studies through cETO. Notwithstanding, I contacted cETO and they advised me to gain approval from our Dean. The following message is from our Dean: His work with the title 'The role of IT ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: an empirical study' is about a hypothesized relationship between IT resources, practices, capabilities, hospital departments' knowledge processes, and the department's ability to sense and respond to patient needs and wishes adequately, i.e., patient agility. Data were systematically collected as part of five Master student's thesis projects. These students conveniently sampled data from 107 clinical hospital departments in the Netherlands. The survey is based on previously validated measures, and data were collected with informed consent and in line with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) principles. Data were treated anonymously and analyzed only on an aggregate level for model assessment purposes using appropriate methods. Also, patients did not participate in this work. In conclusion, this work applied our Faculty's research principles, and for this type of work, there is no need to go through our Research Ethics Committee (cETO) further, our university-wide advisory committee that operates under the deans of the faculties. Prof.dr. Marko van Eekelen Dean Faculty of Science Open University of the Netherlands Valkenburgerweg 177 6419 AT Heerlen, The Netherlands All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (dr. Van de Wetering). The data are not publicly available due to restrictions.