TY - JOUR T1 - Cortical function and sensorimotor plasticity predict future low back pain after an acute episode: the UPWaRD prospective cohort study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.07.14.21260552 SP - 2021.07.14.21260552 AU - Luke C Jenkins AU - Wei-Ju Chang AU - Valentina Buscemi AU - Matthew Liston AU - Peter Humburg AU - Michael Nicholas AU - Thomas Graven-Nielsen AU - Paul W Hodges AU - James H McAuley AU - Siobhan M Schabrun Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/18/2021.07.14.21260552.abstract N2 - Predicting the development of chronic low back pain (LBP) at the time of an acute episode remains challenging. The Understanding persistent Pain Where it ResiDes (UPWaRD) study aimed to identify neurobiological and psychological risk factors for chronic LBP. Individuals with acute LBP (N=120) participated in a prospective cohort study with six-month follow-up. Candidate predictors were selected from the neurobiological (e.g. sensorimotor cortical excitability assessed by sensory and motor evoked potentials, Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor genotype), psychological (e.g. depression and anxiety), symptom-related (e.g. LBP history) and demographic domains. Analyses involved multivariable linear regression models with pain intensity or disability degree as continuous variables. Secondary analyses involved a multivariable logistic model with presence of low back pain at six months (thresholding pain intensity and disability degree) as a dichotomous variable. Lower sensory cortex and corticomotor excitability, higher baseline pain intensity, higher depression, stress and pain catastrophizing were the strongest predictors (R2=0.47) of pain intensity at six months. Older age and higher pain catastrophizing were the strongest predictors (R2=0.30) of disability at six months. When LBP outcome was dichotomised, sensory cortex and corticomotor excitability, BDNF genotype, depression and anxiety, LBP history and baseline pain intensity, accurately discriminated those who did and did not report LBP at six months (c-statistic 0.91). This study identifies novel risk factors for future LBP after an acute episode that can predict an individual’s pain intensity and level of disability at six-month follow-up, and accurately discriminate between those who will and will not report LBP at six months.Competing Interest StatementThis work was supported by grant 1059116 from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia. SMS and PWH receive salary support from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (1105040 and 1102905, respectively). TGN is a part of Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP) that is supported by the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF121).Clinical TrialACTRN12619000002189; Pre-resultsClinical Protocols http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029027 Funding StatementThis work was supported by grant 1059116 from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All procedures were approved by Western Sydney University (H10465) and Neuroscience Research Australia (SSA:16/002) Human Research Ethics Committees and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of the World Medical Association. All participants gave written informed consent.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [SMS], upon reasonable request. ER -