PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Catalina Lunca
AU  - Cristian Cojocaru
AU  - Irina Luciana Gurzu
AU  - Florin Dumitru Petrariu
AU  - Elena Cojocaru
TI  - Performance of antigenic detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples
AID  - 10.1101/2021.07.12.21260263
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.07.12.21260263
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/16/2021.07.12.21260263.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/16/2021.07.12.21260263.full
AB  - Objectives SARS-CoV-2 virus detection on nasopharyngeal specimens to infected individuals has become a challenge for the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. We aim at comparing the performance of antigenic detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples via an immunochromatographic method to molecular detection via qRT-PCR.Materials and Methods 47 nasopharyngeal exudates were collected from suspicious COVID-19 cases. The samples were performed both via the qualitative immuno-chromatographic method for S protein detection in the SARS-CoV-2 structure, using fluorescent labelled anti-protein S antibodies and via qRT-PCR test for the qualitative detection of the screening gene E and the specific ORF1ab region of the RNA-SARS-CoV-2.Results There was a fair correlation between the positive antigen tests and the positive PCR assays measured through threshold cycle ORF1ab region (Ct orf). A better correlation was obtained between the antigen test results and the Ct orf when including patients with Ct orf below 25.Conclusions Using antigen tests as screening tests is useful on symptomatic persons during the viral replication period, therefore during the contagious period. A positive test shows a high predictive value for infection, while a negative antigen test result via immuno-chromatography must be confirmed by a qRT-PCR test.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialN/AFunding StatementThis research received no external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Scientific Council/Ethics Board of the Netconsult SRL, Iasi, Romania (No 2/23 March 2020).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [CC], upon reasonable request.