%0 Journal Article %A Emily Gard Marshall %A Sara Wuite %A Beverley Lawson %A Melissa K. Andrew %A Lynn Edwards %A Adrian MacKenzie %A Ana Correa Woodrow %A Sarah Peddle %T “What do you mean I can’t have a doctor? This is Canada!” - The myriad of consequences for unattached patients: health outcomes, mistrust, and strategic efforts to self-manage health and gain access to primary care %D 2021 %R 10.1101/2021.07.07.21260143 %J medRxiv %P 2021.07.07.21260143 %X Access and attachment to primary healthcare (PHC) is foundational to stronger healthcare systems and healthier populations yet has declined over time. We explore consequences of unattachment employing a realist-informed qualitative study with unattached patients in Nova Scotia, Canada. Semi-structured interviews with nine participants were conducted. The framework method was used to structure analysis, guided by Donabedian’s model of assessing healthcare access and quality. Five key findings noted: participants used creative strategies to attempt to gain attachment to a PHC provider; and to address their health needs in the absence of a regular PHC provider; participants experienced negative feelings about themselves and the healthcare system; stress related to the added work of being unattached, and health consequences from lost care. These findings may underestimate unattachment consequences for further at-risk populations not represented in the data. Consequences of unattachment could be mitigated by interventions, such as enhanced centralized waitlists promoting attachment.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Nova Scotia Health Research Fund (#1021744)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board (#1022374)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDue to the identifiable nature of raw data (interview transcripts), they are not publicly available. Requests for additional information about study data or results can be forwarded to the corresponding author (EGM). %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/07/10/2021.07.07.21260143.full.pdf