PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Thomas Perkmann AU - Nicole Perkmann-Nagele AU - Patrick Mucher AU - Astrid Radakovics AU - Manuela Repl AU - Thomas Koller AU - Galateja Jordakieva AU - Oswald F Wagner AU - Christoph J Binder AU - Helmuth Haslacher TI - Initial SARS-CoV-2 vaccination response can predict booster response for BNT162b2 but not for AZD1222 AID - 10.1101/2021.07.06.21260059 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.07.06.21260059 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/07/2021.07.06.21260059.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/07/2021.07.06.21260059.full AB - Objectives Our objective was to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels after the first dose can predict the final antibody response and whether this is dependent on the vaccine type.Methods 69 BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and 55 AZD1222 (AstraZeneca) vaccinees without previous infection or immunosuppressive medication were included. Anti-body levels were quantified 3 weeks after dose 1, in case of AZD1222 directly before boostering (11 weeks after dose 1) and 3 weeks after dose 2, with the Roche SARS-CoV-2 S total antibody assay.Results Pre-booster (BNT162b2: 80.6 [25.5-167.0] BAU/mL, AZD1222: 56.4 [36.4-104.8] BAU/mL, not significant) and post-booster levels (BNT162b2: 2,092.0 [1,216.3-4,431.8] BAU/mL, AZD1222: 957.0 [684.5-1,684.8] BAU/mL, p<0.0001) correlated well in BNT162b2 (ρ=0.53) but not in AZD1222 recipients. Moreover, antibody levels after the first dose of BNT162b2 correlated inversely with age (ρ=-0.33, P=0.013), whereas a positive correlation with age was observed after the second dose in AZD1222 recipients (ρ=0.26, P=0.030).Conclusions In conclusion, our data suggest that antibody levels quantified by the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 S assay before the booster shot could infer post-booster responses to BNT162b2, but not to AZ1222. In addition, we found a vaccine-dependent effect on antibody responses, suggesting a possible link between vaccine response and vector immunity.Competing Interest StatementThe Department of Laboratory Medicine received compensations for advertisement on scientific symposia from Roche, and holds a grant for evaluating an in vitro diagnostic device from Roche.Funding StatementThere was no additional funding received for the present work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The protocol of this performance evaluation study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK 1066/2021).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available for interested researchers upon request in compliance with applicable data protection laws.