RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Spatiotemporal dissemination pattern of SARS-CoV-2 B1.1.28-derived lineages introduced into Uruguay across its southeastern border with Brazil
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.07.05.21259760
DO 10.1101/2021.07.05.21259760
A1 Natalia Rego
A1 Tamara Fernández-Calero
A1 Ighor Arantes
A1 Verónica Noya
A1 Daiana Mir
A1 Mariana Brandes
A1 Juan Zanetti
A1 Mailen Arleo
A1 Emiliano Pereira
A1 Tania Possi
A1 Odhille Chappos
A1 Lucia Bilbao
A1 Natalia Reyes
A1 Melissa Duquía
A1 Matías Victoria
A1 Pía Techera
A1 María José Benítez-Galeano
A1 Luciana Griffero
A1 Mauricio Méndez
A1 Belén González
A1 Pablo Smircich
A1 Rodney Colina
A1 Cecilia Alonso
A1 Gonzalo Bello
A1 Lucía Spangenberg
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/07/2021.07.05.21259760.abstract
AB During the first nine months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Uruguay successfully kept it under control, even when our previous studies support a recurrent viral flux across the Uruguayan-Brazilian border that sourced several local outbreaks in Uruguay. However, towards the end of 2020, a remarkable exponential growth was observed and the TETRIS strategy was lost. Here, we aimed to understand the factors that fueled SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics during the first epidemic wave in the country. We recovered 84 whole viral genomes from patients diagnosed between November, 2020 and February, 2021 in Rocha, a sentinel eastern Uruguayan department bordering Brazil. The lineage B.1.1.28 was the most prevalent in Rocha during November-December 2020, P.2 became the dominant one during January-February 2021, while the first P.1 sequences corresponds to February, 2021. The lineage replacement process agrees with that observed in several Brazilian states, including Rio Grande do Sul (RS). We observed a one to three month delay between the appearance of P.2 and P.1 in RS and their subsequent detection in Rocha. The phylogenetic analysis detected two B.1.1.28 and one P.2 main Uruguayan SARS-CoV-2 clades, introduced from the southern and southeastern Brazilian regions into Rocha between early November and mid December, 2020. One synonymous mutation distinguishes the sequences of the main B.1.1.28 clade in Rocha from those widely distributed in RS. The minor B.1.1.28 cluster, distinguished by several mutations, harbours non-synonymous changes in the Spike protein: Q675H and Q677H, so far not concurrently reported. The convergent appearance of S:Q677H in different viral lineages and its proximity to the S1/S2 cleavage site raise concerns about its functional relevance. The observed S:E484K-VOI P.2 partial replacement of previously circulating lineages in Rocha might have increased transmissibility as suggested by the significant decrease in Ct values. Our study emphasizes the impact of Brazilian SARS-CoV-2 epidemics in Uruguay and the need of reinforcing real-time genomic surveillance on specific Uruguayan border locations, as one of the key elements for achieving long-term COVID-19 epidemic control.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementIn Uruguay, this work was funded by the Manuel Perez Foundation that nucleated COVID-19 donation funds in the context of the project "Vigilancia epidemiologica del COVID-19 en las fronteras uruguayas y analisis de su transmision en el interior del pais." This work was also supported by FOCEM - Fondo para la Convergencia Estructural del Mercosur (COF 03/11) and by CSIC, through the project "Fortalecimiento de la capacidad de vigilancia epidemiologica de Covid-19 en la zona fronteriza".Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All relevant ethical guidelines have been appropriately followed. The project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Sanatorio Americano SASA (Uruguay) by Dr. Cluzet, Dr. Aliaga, Dr. Mendez and Mr. Riera. Ethical approval was given and signed informed consent was obtained from the participants.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll genome sequences obtained in this study were uploaded at the EpiCoV database in the GISAID initiative. All genomes obtained in this study were uploaded at the EpiCoV database in the GISAID. Accession numbers are in Table S1.