PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Bailey K. Fosdick
AU  - Jude Bayham
AU  - Jake Dilliott
AU  - Gregory D. Ebel
AU  - Nicole Ehrhart
TI  - Model-based Evaluation of Continued COVID-19 Risk at Long Term Care Facilities
AID  - 10.1101/2021.07.06.21259931
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.07.06.21259931
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/07/2021.07.06.21259931.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/07/2021.07.06.21259931.full
AB  - The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted long-term care facilities resulting in the death of approximately 8% of residents nationwide. As COVID-19 case rates decline and state and county restrictions are lifted, facility managers, local and state health agencies are challenged with defining their own policies moving forward to appropriately mitigate disease transmission. The continued emergence of variants of concern has highlighted the need for a readily available tool that can be employed at the facility-level to determine best practices for mitigation and ensure resident and staff safety. To assist leadership in determining the impact of various infection surveillance and response strategies, we developed an agent-based model and an online dashboard interface that simulates COVID-19 infection within congregate care settings under various mitigation measures. In this paper, we demonstrate how this dashboard can be used to quantify the continued risk for COVID-19 infections within a facility given a designated testing schedule and vaccine requirements. Our results highlight the critical nature of testing cadence, test sensitivity and specificity, and the impact of removing asymptomatic infected individuals from the workplace. We also show that monthly surveillance testing at long-term care facilities is unlikely to successfully mitigate SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in congregate care settings.Disclosures This work was supported by Colorado State University’s Center for Healthy Aging, the Center for Vector-Bourne Infectious Disease, the Office of the Vice President for Research, the College of Health and Human Sciences, the Collage of Natural Sciences, the College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and the Walter Scott Jr College of Engineering.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No human subjects.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDashboard code available. http://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4984845