@article {Hedley2021.06.30.21259819, author = {Paula L. Hedley and Steen Hoffmann and Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen and Marianne Voldstedlund and Karsten Dalsgaard Bjerre and Anders Hviid and Lone Krebs and J{\o}rgen S. Jensen and Michael Christiansen}, title = {A nationwide study of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Denmark during the COVID-19 pandemic}, elocation-id = {2021.06.30.21259819}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.06.30.21259819}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Objectives COVID-19 policies have been employed in Denmark since March 2020. We examined whether COVID-19 restrictions had an impact on Chlamydia trachomatis infections compared with 2018 and 2019.Methods This retrospective nation-wide Danish observational study was performed using monthly incidences of laboratory confirmed chlamydia cases and number of tests, obtained from nation-wide surveillance data. Additionally, Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker data, and Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports were used to contextualise the behavioural adaptions seen as a result of COVID-19 policies. Testing rates were compared using Poisson regression and test positivity rates were compared using logistic regression.Results The crude incidence rate (IR) of laboratory confirmed chlamydia infections was reduced to 66.5 per 105 during the first (March-April 2020) lockdown period as compared to 88.3 per 105 in March-April 2018-2019, but the testing rate was also reduced (Rate ratio 0.72 95\% CI 0.71 {\textendash} 0.73), whereas the odds ratio for a positive test between the two periods was 0.98 (95\% CI 0.96 {\textendash} 1.00). The period of eased COVID 19 restrictions (May {\textendash} December 2020) and the second lockdown period (December 2020 {\textendash} March 2021) were characterised by marginally increased crude IRs, while the number of tests performed, and test positivity rates returned very close to the levels seen in 2018-2019. These results were independent of sex, age group, and geographical location.Conclusion The first Danish COVID-19 lockdown resulted in a reduction in the number of chlamydia tests performed and a consequent reduction in the number of laboratory-identified cases. This period was followed by a return of testing and test positivity close to the level seen in 2018 {\textendash} 2019. Altogether the Danish COVID-19 restrictions have had negligible effects on laboratory confirmed C. trachomatis transmission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was conducted using data retrieved from the MiBa database where data are publically available.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData on incidence of positive chlamydia tests are publically available from the MiBa SSI webportal (www.ssi.dk). Data on test number were obtained from data not yet processed for the MiBa database.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/06/2021.06.30.21259819}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/06/2021.06.30.21259819.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }